30 Cited authorities

  1. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 267,838 times   366 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "
  2. Tellabs v. Makor Issues Rights

    551 U.S. 308 (2007)   Cited 9,156 times   104 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a strong inference is one that is "cogent and at least as compelling as any opposing inference"
  3. Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.

    513 U.S. 561 (1995)   Cited 998 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 12 does not apply to secondary market transactions as the statute's inclusion of the term “prospectus” evinces an intent to limit the Sections's scope solely to the initial public offering
  4. Novak v. Kasaks

    216 F.3d 300 (2d Cir. 2000)   Cited 1,599 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding section 78u-4(b) does not literally require pleading of all facts, so long as facts pleaded provide adequate basis for believing statements were false
  5. Rombach v. Chang

    355 F.3d 164 (2d Cir. 2004)   Cited 1,390 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that complaint may establish scienter through facts showing that defendants "had both motive and opportunity to commit fraud"
  6. Kramer v. Time Warner Inc.

    937 F.2d 767 (2d Cir. 1991)   Cited 1,989 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Court may consider matters of which judicial notice may be taken under Federal Rule of Evidence 201
  7. Rothman v. Gregor

    220 F.3d 81 (2d Cir. 2000)   Cited 1,325 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the date of the filing of the motion to amend constitutes the date the action was commenced for statute of limitations purposes" when "the plaintiff seeks to add a new defendant" (quoting Nw. Nat’l Ins. Co. v. Alberts , 769 F. Supp. 498, 510 (S.D.N.Y.1991) )
  8. Kalnit v. Eichler

    264 F.3d 131 (2d Cir. 2001)   Cited 847 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where a complaint “does not present facts indicating a clear duty to disclose” it does not establish “ strong evidence of conscious misbehavior or recklessness”
  9. Teams. Local 445 v. Dynex Cap

    531 F.3d 190 (2d Cir. 2008)   Cited 447 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs failed to allege corporate scienter where they did not specifically identify reports or statements to which the corporate officer had access that would have contradicted the allegedly fraudulent corporate statements at issue
  10. First Nationwide Bank v. Gelt Funding Corp.

    27 F.3d 763 (2d Cir. 1994)   Cited 660 times
    Holding that allegations of a methodologically unreliable appraisal were not sufficient to establish property values as a fact in a RICO complaint
  11. Rule 9 - Pleading Special Matters

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 9   Cited 39,016 times   320 Legal Analyses
    Permitting "[m]alice, intent, knowledge, and other conditions of a person's mind [to] be alleged generally"
  12. Section 77m - Limitation of actions

    15 U.S.C. § 77m   Cited 955 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Establishing a one-year statute of limitations for §§ 11 and 12 claims which begins to run upon "the discovery of the untrue statement or omission, or after such discovery should have been made by the exercise of reasonable diligence"
  13. Section 229.512 - (Item 512) Undertakings

    17 C.F.R. § 229.512   Cited 39 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that the SEC's position is that indemnification to officers and directors for liabilities arising under the Securities Act is against public policy and such indemnification is unenforceable, with the exception for expenses incurred in successful defense of any action
  14. Section 230.415 - Delayed or continuous offering and sale of securities

    17 C.F.R. § 230.415   Cited 33 times
    Permitting registration of securities to be issued on a "continuous" or "delayed" basis