§Why CasetextPricing

In re Charles Schwab Corp. Securities Litigation

MOTION for Summary Judgment of Independent Trustees

24 Cited authorities

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 217,034 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"

  2. Pinter v. Dahl

    486 U.S. 622 (1988)   Cited 861 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that only a statutory "seller" may be liable under § 12 of Securities Act

  3. Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

    29 Cal.4th 1134 (Cal. 2003)   Cited 1,660 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiff cannot recover damages under Cal. Bus. Prof. Code § 17200 unless plaintiff has "an ownership interest in the money it seeks to recover"

  4. Sparling v. Daou

    411 F.3d 1006 (9th Cir. 2005)   Cited 1,289 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that scienter is an element of § 10(b) claim

  5. Moore v. Kayport Package Exp., Inc.

    885 F.2d 531 (9th Cir. 1989)   Cited 1,846 times
    Holding that a complaint did not satisfy Rule 9(b) because it "d[id] not specify which plaintiff received which prospectus, or which plaintiff made purchases through the stockbroker defendants"

  6. Rosenzweig v. Azurix Corp.

    332 F.3d 854 (5th Cir. 2003)   Cited 1,001 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that district court did not abuse discretion in denying motion to amend complaint where "plaintiffs did not attach a proposed amended complaint," leaving district court to "speculate" about how additional facts might amount to a legal claim

  7. Shaw v. Digital Equipment Corp.

    82 F.3d 1194 (1st Cir. 1996)   Cited 1,011 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the bespeaks caution doctrine does not apply to representations of "present facts" that were false when made

  8. Craftmatic Securities Litigation v. Kraftsow

    890 F.2d 628 (3d Cir. 1989)   Cited 538 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "claims essentially grounded on corporate mismanagement are not cognizable under federal law"

  9. In re Stratosphere Corp. Securities Litigation

    1 F. Supp. 2d 1096 (D. Nev. 1998)   Cited 92 times
    Holding that the group pleading doctrine survived the enactment of the Reform Act

  10. In re Charles Schwab Corporation Securities Litigation

    257 F.R.D. 534 (N.D. Cal. 2009)   Cited 56 times
    Finding that mere participation in a solicitation or sale does not suffice

  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 329,937 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  12. Section 17200 - Unfair competition defined

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200   Cited 17,923 times   315 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting unlawful business practices

  13. Section 17203 - Injunctive relief

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17203   Cited 990 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Requiring that an individual plead that she lost "money or property" because of the alleged deceptive conduct

  14. Section 77l - Civil liabilities arising in connection with prospectuses and communications

    15 U.S.C. § 77l   Cited 825 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing relief if the offering documents contain just one untrue statement of material fact