4 Cited authorities

  1. National Medical Enterprises Inc. v. Godbey

    924 S.W.2d 123 (Tex. 1996)   Cited 116 times
    Holding that a matter was adverse to movant for lawyer disqualification where risk of movant being negatively affected by the representation was small, but the consequences would be great
  2. In re First American Corp.

    263 F.R.D. 549 (C.D. Cal. 2009)   Cited 23 times
    Holding that certain named ERISA plan participants have standing to serve as class representatives under U.S. Const Art. III
  3. In re Diebold Erisa Litigation

    CASE NO. 5:06 CV 0170 (N.D. Ohio May. 28, 2008)   Cited 7 times

    CASE NO. 5:06 CV 0170. May 28, 2008 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER PETER ECONOMUS, District Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' Consolidated Class Action Complaint. (Doc. No. 44.) I. Background This consolidation class action seeks recovery for former Diebold employees who invested in Diebold stock through the company's 401(k) Savings Plan (the "Plan"). It is premised on violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"), and names as

  4. In re Cardinal Health, Inc.

    Civil Action 2:04-CV-643 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 26, 2006)

    Civil Action 2:04-CV-643. April 26, 2006 ORDER NORAH KING, Magistrate Judge With the agreement of the parties, the motion to certify, Doc. No. 98, is WITHDRAWN. The joint motion to stay briefing on that motion to certify, Doc. No. 99, is DENIED as MOOT.