22 Cited authorities

  1. Horne v. Flores

    557 U.S. 433 (2009)   Cited 669 times
    Holding injunction mandating sweeping changes to Texas's foster care system overly broad
  2. Lane v. Facebook, Inc.

    696 F.3d 811 (9th Cir. 2012)   Cited 409 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Rule 23(e) "does not require detailed analysis of the statutes or causes of action forming the basis for the plaintiff class' claims, and it does not require an estimate of the potential value of those claims"
  3. In re Baby Prods. Antitrust Litig.

    708 F.3d 163 (3d Cir. 2013)   Cited 143 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that cy pres settlements are permissible, but noting that they substitute "an indirect benefit that is at best attenuated and at worse illusory" for compensatory damages
  4. Marshall v. Board of Ed., Bergenfield, N. J

    575 F.2d 417 (3d Cir. 1978)   Cited 238 times
    Holding it was not an abuse of discretion to deny 60(b) relief where "no circumstances, least of all 'exceptional circumstances' requiring 'extraordinary relief,' [were] demonstrated"
  5. In re Pharmaceutical Indus Average Wholesale

    588 F.3d 24 (1st Cir. 2009)   Cited 96 times
    Holding that district court could incorporate by reference its prior orders when expanding a class
  6. Klier v. Elf Atochem North America, Inc.

    658 F.3d 468 (5th Cir. 2011)   Cited 74 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that additional pro rata distributions to class members should be made as until it was no longer feasible to do so
  7. Rohn v. TAP Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.

    677 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 2012)   Cited 51 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that a disbursement order was merely ministerial because it was entered subsequent to an order that awarded distribution to a specific party
  8. Rosen v. Tennessee Commissioner of Finance & Administration

    288 F.3d 918 (6th Cir. 2002)   Cited 65 times
    Rejecting plaintiffs' argument that "[s]ince they . . . will potentially be affected by [the statute] in the future, . . . they ha[d] the requisite personal stake in its implementation now"
  9. Carver v. Sheriff of LaSalle County, Illinois

    243 F.3d 379 (7th Cir. 2001)   Cited 65 times
    Holding that the LaSalle County Sheriff's Office and LaSalle County are "separate entities, and thus separate 'employers' for purposes of Title VII"
  10. United States of America v. Microsoft Corp.

    147 F.3d 935 (D.C. Cir. 1998)   Cited 68 times
    Concluding that injunction was improper insofar as "the parties' rights must be determined, not merely enforced," by special master
  11. Section 1304 - Judgments, awards, and compromise settlements

    31 U.S.C. § 1304   Cited 301 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Appropriating funds for interest on certain district court judgments