§Why CasetextPricing

In Re: Bank of New York Mellon Corporation Foreign Exchange Transactions Litigation

MOTION For Emergency Relief. Document

11 Cited authorities

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.

    501 U.S. 32 (1991)   Cited 9,208 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts "may bar from the courtroom a criminal defendant who disrupts a trial" may "assess attorney fees when a party has acted in bad faith, vexatiously, wantonly, or for oppressive reasons," and "may act sua sponte to dismiss a suit for failure to prosecute"

  2. Residential Funding Corp. v. Degeorge Financial

    306 F.3d 99 (2d Cir. 2002)   Cited 873 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Holding evidence of bad faith or gross negligence that satisfies the culpable-state-of-mind requirement is also usually sufficient to satisfy the relevance requirement

  3. In re Sealed Case

    141 F.3d 337 (D.C. Cir. 1998)   Cited 133 times
    Holding that a district court may not transfer motion to quash subpoena issued to nonparty

  4. Universitas Educ., LLC v. Nova Grp., Inc.

    11 Civ. 1590 (LTS)(HBP) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 4, 2013)   Cited 49 times
    Denying motion to quash based on "preemptive assertion" of privilege because "unadorned assertion that 'other questions [counsel] may ask may very well be protected from discovery by the attorney-client privilege'" does not satisfy standard for assertion of privilege under Rule 45

  5. US Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. PHL Variable Ins. Co.

    12 Civ. 6811 (CM) (JCF) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 5, 2012)   Cited 25 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Awarding search, collection, and production costs associated with compliance, but holding that the "non-parties shall bear their own costs of reviewing the documents for privilege," and noting that "[g]enerally, it is not appropriate to shift such costs because the producing party has the exclusive ability to control the cost of reviewing the documents"

  6. In re Application of Chevron Corporation

    736 F. Supp. 2d 773 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)   Cited 24 times
    Noting journalist "has advanced no persuasive reason why he should not be compelled to claim privilege . . . in the same manner as any other litigant-providing a privilege log enumerating the documents as to which privilege is claimed and including as to each such information as may be necessary to make out his claim of qualified journalist privilege"

  7. Fox Industries, Inc. v. Gurovich

    CV 03-5166 (TCP) (WDW) (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 6, 2006)   Cited 22 times
    Finding that an attorney had interfered with a subpoena issued to a third-party where he "directed the non-parties not to respond"

  8. Price v. Trans Union, L.L.C.

    847 F. Supp. 2d 788 (E.D. Pa. 2012)   Cited 15 times
    Finding a "clear" and "sanctionable" violation of Rule 45 where a party's counsel interfered with third-party discovery by advising "the person commanded by the [Rule 45] subpoena . . . to ignore the subpoena's command"

  9. Se. Pa. Transp. Auth. v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon Corp. (In re Bank of N.Y. Mellon Corp.)

    921 F. Supp. 2d 56 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)   Cited 10 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Master Docket No. 12 MD 2335 (LAK). 2013-01-23 In re: BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP. FOREX TRANSACTIONS LITIGATION. This document relates to: Southeastern Pennsylvania Transp. Auth. v. The Bank of New York Mellon Corp., et al., 12 Civ. 3066 (LAK). Joseph H. Meltzer, Darren J. Check, Matthew Mustokoff, Peter H. LeVan, Jr., Naumon A. Amjed, Sean M. Handler, Ryan T. Degnan, Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP, Bradley E. Beckworth, Brad E. Seidel, Susan Whatley, Jeffrey J. Angelovich, Lisa Baldwin, Nix

  10. Carolina Materials, LLC v. Continental Casualty Co.

    CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:08CV158-RJC (W.D.N.C. Jan. 19, 2010)

    CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:08CV158-RJC. January 19, 2010 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DAVID CAYER, Magistrate Judge THIS MATTER is before the Court on "Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Compliance with Court Order" (document#67) filed December 7, 2009. On December 15, 2009, Defendant filed "Defendant's Motion to Compel Production of Materials from Equity Investment Partners, LLC Pursuant to a Subpoena and to Shorten Plaintiff's Response Time to December 21, 2009" (document#71) and "Defendant's Brief in Support of Motion

  11. Rule 45 - Subpoena

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 45   Cited 16,544 times   105 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a subpoena may command a person to attend a trial, hearing, or deposition "within 100 miles of where the person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person"