Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
331 F.3d 1122 (9th Cir. 2003) Cited 3,520 timesHolding that the Phillips exception is "expressly limited to the status of materials . . . attached to a non-dispositive motion"
Brown Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C
710 F.2d 1165 (6th Cir. 1983) Cited 966 times 3 Legal AnalysesHolding that the First Amendment limits judicial discretion to seal documents in a civil case
Jacques v. First Nat'l Bank
307 Md. 527 (Md. 1986) Cited 421 timesHolding that a bank owed a duty of care to vulnerable loan applicants
Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, Inc.
858 F.2d 775 (1st Cir. 1988) Cited 291 timesHolding that public has presumptive right under Fed.R.Civ.P. 5(d) and 26(c) to inspect discovery materials filed with the district court and that "[t]he effect of . . . nonfiling was to deny the public the right it would otherwise have had to inspect freely the discovery materials in this case"
Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc.
805 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1986) Cited 264 timesHolding that a district court's order protecting discovery materials from public disclosure with a limited exception for the producers of a particular television program violates other press outlets' First Amendment rights because " court may not selectively exclude news media from access to information otherwise made available for public dissemination"
In re Providence Journal Co., Inc.
293 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2002) Cited 166 timesHolding that the District of Rhode Island's blanket policy of refusing to file memoranda of law that counsel were required to submit in connection with motions violated the First Amendment
Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Standard Fin. Mgmt. Corp.
830 F.2d 404 (1st Cir. 1987) Cited 240 timesHolding that "relevant documents which are submitted to, and accepted by, a court of competent jurisdiction in the course of adjudicatory proceedings, become documents to which the presumption of public access applies," and "[o]nce those submissions come to the attention of the district judge, they can fairly be assumed to play a role in the court's deliberations"
Matter of Continental Ill. Sec. Litigation
732 F.2d 1302 (7th Cir. 1984) Cited 241 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that order granting access did not merit reversal despite insufficiently specific findings but noting that findings on the record are more crucial for orders denying access
Siedle v. Putnam Investments, Inc.
147 F.3d 7 (1st Cir. 1998) Cited 147 timesReversing district court's decision to unseal privileged documents at the request of a newspaper
American Tel. Tel. Co. v. Grady
594 F.2d 594 (7th Cir. 1978) Cited 175 timesModifying a protective order
Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 Cited 99,217 times 679 Legal AnalysesAdopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37
Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers
Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 Cited 23,110 times 16 Legal AnalysesProviding for service via CM/ECF Systems