Warth v. Seldin

Holding that Article III requires plaintiffs "to establish that, in fact, the asserted injury was the consequence of the defendants' actions"

Valley Forge College v. Americans United

Holding that "the psychological consequence presumably produced by observation of conduct with which one disagrees ... is not an injury sufficient to confer standing under Art. III, even though the disagreement is phrased in constitutional terms"

Great-West Life Annuity Ins. Co. v. Knudson

Holding an injunction ordering money funds to be legal relief because it sought to "impo[se] personal liability for the benefits that they conferred upon respondents"

Teamsters v. Terry

Holding that a breach of a collective bargaining agreement is most analogous to a "breach of contract claim"

Curtis v. Loether

Holding that the Seventh Amendment does apply to actions enforcing newly enacted statutory rights so long as they are "analogous" to those that could have been brought at law in 18th–century England

Rollins v. Butland

Holding that a private individual seeking a consumer claim for damages under FDUTPA has to prove actual damages

Allison v. Citgo Petroleum Corp.

Holding that certification under Rule 23(b) was not appropriate because "plaintiffs' claims for compensatory and punitive damages must therefore focus almost entirely on facts and issues specific to individuals rather than the class as a whole"

Ragsdale v. Rubbermaid, Inc.

Holding that a qui tam plaintiff could have brought a claim in the previous action that he had instead severed in order to bring the second action, and thus the nuclei of operative facts were the same and the second case was precluded

Nilsen v. City of Moss Point, Miss

Holding that denial of leave to amend to add claims does not prevent application of claim preclusion in a subsequent action where the plaintiff attempts to bring the same claims

Licul v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am., Inc.

Holding that allegations that defendant had not warned its consumers or plaintiffs of a defect were "wholly insufficient to supply the affirmative steps taken to prevent [p]laintiffs from discovering the basis of their claims that would be necessary before tolling based on fraudulent concealment becomes appropriate"

Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

Rule 33 - Interrogatories to Parties

Adopting Rule 30(b)

Section 2301 - Definitions

Including as consumers those entitled to enforce a warranty "under applicable State law"

Rule 38 - Right to a Jury Trial; Demand

Explaining that a party waives its right to a jury trial by failing to properly request one

Section 501.201 - Short title