25 Cited authorities

Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz
471 U.S. 462 (1985) Cited 17,086 times 46 Legal Analyses
Holding that a defendant has "fair warning" if he purposefully directs his activities at residents of the forum and if the litigation results from alleged injuries arising out of or relating to those activities.
World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson
444 U.S. 286 (1980) Cited 10,957 times 32 Legal Analyses
Holding that an Oklahoma court could not exercise personal jurisdiction over a car retailer when the retailer's only connection to Oklahoma was the fact that a car sold in New York became involved in an accident in Oklahoma
Ins. Corp. of Ir. v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De Guinee
456 U.S. 694 (1982) Cited 3,953 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that unlike subject matter jurisdiction, a defect in personal jurisdiction can be waived
Int'l Shoe Co. v. Washington
326 U.S. 310 (1945) Cited 22,892 times 110 Legal Analyses
Holding that states may exercise personal jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants with "certain minimum contacts with [the forum] such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend ‘traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice’ " (quoting Milliken v. Meyer , 311 U.S. 457, 463, 61 S.Ct. 339, 85 L.Ed. 278 (1940) )
Lexecon Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes Lerach
523 U.S. 26 (1998) Cited 873 times 10 Legal Analyses
Holding that, because the remand requirement is absolute, the transferee court may not invoke the change-of-venue statute to assign transferred cases to itself for trial
Mellon Bank (East) PSFS, National Ass'n v. Farino
960 F.2d 1217 (3d Cir. 1992) Cited 1,141 times
Holding that plaintiff's right to conduct jurisdictional discovery should be sustained when factual allegations suggest the possible existence of requisite contacts between the defendant and the forum state with "reasonable particularity"
Petrucelli v. Bohringer & Ratzinger
46 F.3d 1298 (3d Cir. 1995) Cited 854 times
Holding "a district court may not consider the fact that the statute of limitation has run until after [the court] has conducted an examination of good cause"
Conn v. Zakharov
667 F.3d 705 (6th Cir. 2012) Cited 340 times
Holding that Ohio's Long-Arm statute is not coterminous with the Due Process Clause
Pennzoil Products Co. v. Colelli Associates
149 F.3d 197 (3d Cir. 1998) Cited 433 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that district court may assert personal jurisdiction "over non-resident defendants to the extent permissible under the law of the state where the district court sits"
Goldstein v. Christiansen
70 Ohio St. 3d 232 (Ohio 1994) Cited 414 times
Holding that Ohio's long-arm statute does not extend to the limits of the Due Process Clause and that the two issues must be analyzed separately.
Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 Cited 354,229 times 943 Legal Analyses
Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading
Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 Cited 160,289 times 196 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
Rule 4 - Summons
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 Cited 71,368 times 127 Legal Analyses
Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time
Section 1404 - Change of venue
28 U.S.C. § 1404 Cited 28,851 times 189 Legal Analyses
Granting Class Plaintiffs' motion to transfer action in order to "facilitate a unified settlement approval process together with the class action cases in" In re Amex ASR
Section 2307.382 - Personal jurisdiction
Ohio Rev. Code § 2307.382 Cited 593 times
Enumerating bases for specific jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant, e.g., transacting any business in the state or causing tortious injury in the state

In Re: Asbestos Prod v. Coffin Turbo Pump, et al

25 Cited authorities

Holding that a defendant has "fair warning" if he purposefully directs his activities at residents of the forum and if the litigation results from alleged injuries arising out of or relating to those activities.

Holding that an Oklahoma court could not exercise personal jurisdiction over a car retailer when the retailer's only connection to Oklahoma was the fact that a car sold in New York became involved in an accident in Oklahoma

Holding that unlike subject matter jurisdiction, a defect in personal jurisdiction can be waived

Holding that, because the remand requirement is absolute, the transferee court may not invoke the change-of-venue statute to assign transferred cases to itself for trial

Holding that plaintiff's right to conduct jurisdictional discovery should be sustained when factual allegations suggest the possible existence of requisite contacts between the defendant and the forum state with "reasonable particularity"

Holding "a district court may not consider the fact that the statute of limitation has run until after [the court] has conducted an examination of good cause"

Holding that Ohio's Long-Arm statute is not coterminous with the Due Process Clause

Holding that district court may assert personal jurisdiction "over non-resident defendants to the extent permissible under the law of the state where the district court sits"

Holding that Ohio's long-arm statute does not extend to the limits of the Due Process Clause and that the two issues must be analyzed separately.

Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."

Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time

Granting Class Plaintiffs' motion to transfer action in order to "facilitate a unified settlement approval process together with the class action cases in" In re Amex ASR

Enumerating bases for specific jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant, e.g., transacting any business in the state or causing tortious injury in the state