§Why CasetextPricing

In Re: Aggrenox Antitrust Litigation

Memorandum in Opposition re Cross MOTION to Appoint Counsel

10 Cited authorities

  1. Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc.

    332 F.3d 896 (6th Cir. 2003)   Cited 115 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding such agreements to be per se illegal

  2. In re Lorazepam Clorazepate Antitrust Litigation

    202 F.R.D. 12 (D.D.C. 2001)   Cited 79 times
    Finding that plaintiffs could prove, through common evidence and despite the existence of individualized issues, that defendants' anticompetitive conduct allowed them to hike and sustain high prices of drug causing antitrust injury

  3. In re K–Dur Antitrust Litig.

    686 F.3d 197 (3d Cir. 2012)   Cited 50 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Holding that direct purchasers in a reverse-payment settlement antitrust case can establish antitrust injury with class-wide evidence of overcharges

  4. Valley Drug Co. v. Geneva Pharm., Inc.

    344 F.3d 1294 (11th Cir. 2003)   Cited 57 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that the presence of a reverse payment, by itself, does not transform an otherwise lawful settlement into an unlawful one

  5. Simon v. Keyspan Corp.

    694 F.3d 196 (2d Cir. 2012)   Cited 41 times
    Explaining how the auctions work

  6. Arkansas Carpenters Health & Welfare Fund v. Bayer AG

    604 F.3d 98 (2d Cir. 2010)   Cited 22 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Applying a prior panel's decision while explicitly disagreeing with it and proffering "several reasons why this case might be appropriate for reexamination by our full Court"

  7. In re Air Cargo Shipping Servs. Antitrust Litig.

    697 F.3d 154 (2d Cir. 2012)   Cited 19 times
    Finding that South African Airways was "not an Organ, Agency or Instrumentality" of South Africa when its majority shareholder was a public holding company itself wholly owned by South Africa

  8. Walter v. Palisades Collection, LLC

    CIVIL ACTION, NO. 06-378 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 26, 2010)   Cited 6 times
    Noting ethical violations related to attorney competency

  9. In re Remeron Antitrust Litigation

    Consolidated Case Master Docket No. 02-2007(FSH), Civil Action Nos. 03-85(FSH), 03-323(FSH), Docket No. 03-2221(FSH) (D.N.J. Aug. 20, 2004)

    Consolidated Case Master Docket No. 02-2007(FSH), Civil Action Nos. 03-85(FSH), 03-323(FSH), Docket No. 03-2221(FSH). August 20, 2004. PATTY SHWARTZ, Magistrate Judge This matter having come before the Court by way of letter dated October 7, 2004, in which the plaintiffs request that the Court extend the dates on which briefs are to be submitted in connection with the defendants' motion for summary judgment and the plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment; and the United States District Judge

  10. Rule 23 - Class Actions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 23   Cited 36,137 times   1252 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, to certify a class, the court must find that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members"