§Why CasetextPricing

In Re: Aftermarket Filters Antitrust Litigation

MEMORANDUM

13 Cited authorities

  1. Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois

    431 U.S. 720 (1977)   Cited 1,312 times   61 Legal Analyses
    Holding that indirect purchasers cannot recover damages under federal antitrust law

  2. IN RE OSB ANTITRUST LITIGATION

    Master File No. 06-826 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 3, 2007)   Cited 68 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that A.R.S. § 44-1402 requires "that at least some part of the alleged injury have occurred within the state and have affected consumers within the state"

  3. In re Cardinal Health, Inc. Erisa Litigation

    225 F.R.D. 552 (S.D. Ohio 2005)   Cited 13 times
    Finding that "[c]ounsel cannot represent different classes of plaintiffs with conflicting claims who are seeking recovery from a common pool of assets"

  4. Donaldson v. Pharmacia Pension Plan

    Civil No. 06-3-GPM (S.D. Ill. May. 10, 2006)   Cited 3 times

    Civil No. 06-3-GPM. May 10, 2006 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER G. MURPHY, District Judge This action is before the Court on the Motion to Appoint Interim Class Counsel brought by Schlichter, Bogard Denton ("the SBD firm"), the attorneys for the named Plaintiffs in this case, Fred Donaldson, Albert Walter, III, and Mary Clawson (Doc. 36). For the following reasons, the motion is DENIED. Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that a court "may designate interim counsel to act on behalf of

  5. Crown Oil Corp. v. Superior Court

    177 Cal.App.3d 604 (Cal. Ct. App. 1986)   Cited 5 times

    Docket No. A031735. February 14, 1986. COUNSEL Pillsbury, Madison Sutro, James F. Kirkham, Walter R. Allan, Debra B. Keil, Baker McKenzie, Juan G. Collas, Jr., Bruce H. Jackson and Jonathan S. Kitchen for Petitioners. No appearance for Respondent. Scarpulla Scarpulla, Francis O. Scarpulla, Stephen V. Scarpulla, Mario N. Alioto and Joseph M. Patane for Real Party in Interest. John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Andrea Sheridan Ordin, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Stanford N. Gruskin, Assistant

  6. Section 1332 - Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs

    28 U.S.C. § 1332   Cited 115,903 times   572 Legal Analyses
    Holding district court has jurisdiction over action between diverse citizens "where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000"

  7. Section 1331 - Federal question

    28 U.S.C. § 1331   Cited 100,959 times   140 Legal Analyses
    Finding that in order to invoke federal question jurisdiction, a plaintiff's claims must arise "under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States."

  8. Section 1367 - Supplemental jurisdiction

    28 U.S.C. § 1367   Cited 64,994 times   81 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in civil actions proceeding in federal court based solely on diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, the district court "shall not have supplemental jurisdiction" over "claims by plaintiffs against persons made parties under Rule . . . 24" or "over claims by persons . . seeking to intervene as plaintiffs under Rule 24," if "exercising supplemental jurisdiction over such claims would be inconsistent with the jurisdictional requirements of section 1332"

  9. Rule 23 - Class Actions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 23   Cited 36,245 times   1254 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, to certify a class, the court must find that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members"

  10. Rule 34 - Producing Documents, Electronically Stored Information, and Tangible Things, or Entering onto Land, for Inspection and Other Purposes

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 34   Cited 13,746 times   155 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the rules related to electronic discovery were "not meant to create a routine right of direct access to a party's electronic information system, although such access may be justified in some circumstances."

  11. Section 1407 - Multidistrict litigation

    28 U.S.C. § 1407   Cited 7,156 times   107 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing consolidation of pretrial proceedings for related cases filed in multiple federal districts

  12. Section 1 - Trusts, etc., in restraint of trade illegal; penalty

    15 U.S.C. § 1   Cited 3,260 times   78 Legal Analyses
    Forbidding every "contract, combination . . . or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States"

  13. Section 26 - Injunctive relief for private parties; exception; costs

    15 U.S.C. § 26   Cited 1,485 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing injunctive relief against "threatened loss or damage by a violation of the antitrust laws"