30 Cited authorities

  1. Caldarola v. Calabrese

    298 F.3d 156 (2d Cir. 2002)   Cited 1,192 times
    Holding that information provided by "an identified bystander with no apparent motive to falsify" has "a peculiar likelihood of accuracy"
  2. Boyd v. J.E. Robert Co.

    765 F.3d 123 (2d Cir. 2014)   Cited 50 times
    Holding that "after properly granting summary judgment on the [federal] claims, the [d]istrict [c]ourt had discretion not to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state[-]law claims"
  3. Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman

    137 S. Ct. 30 (2016)

    No. 15–1391. 09-29-2016 EXPRESSIONS HAIR DESIGN, et al., petitioners, v. Eric T. SCHNEIDERMAN, Attorney General of New York, et al. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted.

  4. Spira v. Ashwood Financial, Inc.

    358 F. Supp. 2d 150 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)   Cited 61 times
    Holding that the "last sophisticated consumer" standard "requires the Court to analyze the collection letters from the perspective of a debtor who is uninformed, naive, or trusting, but is making basic, reasonable and logical deductions and inferences."
  5. McGinty v. Prof'l Claims Bureau, Inc.

    15-cv-4356 (SJF)(ARL) (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 17, 2016)   Cited 35 times
    Dismissing a § 1692g claim where "the Collection Letters neither demand that payment be made within thirty days, nor threaten adverse consequences if payment is not received within thirty days," and therefore "the Collection Letters do not contain language that contradicts or is otherwise inconsistent with Plaintiffs' right to demand validation of their debts"
  6. Datiz v. Int'l Recovery Assocs., Inc.

    15-CV-3549 (ADS)(AKT) (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2016)   Cited 32 times
    Rejecting defendant's argument that its letter "clearly implie[d] that [the medical institution] [wa]s the Plaintiff's creditor," and therefore denying defendant's motion to dismiss because "the fact that the caption [of the] ... Letter lists [the medical institution] is not, without more explanation, sufficient to satisfy Section 1692g because it does not identify the Hospital as the Plaintiff's current creditor"
  7. Shami v. Nat'l Enter. Sys.

    914 F. Supp. 2d 353 (E.D.N.Y. 2012)   Cited 24 times
    Granting summary judgment for defendant when the evidence demonstrated that a third party collects and retains the entire processing fee
  8. Thomas v. RJM Acquisition LLC

    No. 12-CV-5294 (JFB)(ARL) (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 24, 2014)   Cited 3 times

    No. 12-CV-5294 (JFB)(ARL) 02-24-2014 JULIUS A. THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. RJM ACQUISITION LLC, Defendant. Plaintiff proceeds pro se. Defendant is represented by Peter T. Shapiro of Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, 77 Water Street, Suite 2100, New York, NY 10005. JOSEPH F. BIANCO MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge: Pro se plaintiff Julius Thomas ("plaintiff") brings this action against defendant RJM Acquisition LLC ("defendant" or "RJM"), alleging violations of the Fair Credit Report

  9. Nicholson v. Forster & Garbus LLP

    No. 13-2394 (2d Cir. Jun. 19, 2014)   Cited 1 times

    No. 13-2394 06-19-2014 JACK NICHOLSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF A CLASS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FORSTER & GARBUS LLP, RONALD FORSTER, MARK A. GARBUS, Defendants-Appellees. FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT: ARZA FELDMAN, Feldman and Feldman, Uniondale, NY. FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES: JONATHAN B. BRUNO, Kaufman, Borgeest & Ryan LLP, New York, NY. DENNIS JACOBS SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED

  10. SEBROW v. ER SOLUTIONS, INC.

    07-CV-5016 (ARR) (VPP) (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 16, 2009)

    07-CV-5016 (ARR) (VPP). January 16, 2009 OPINION AND ORDER ALLYNE ROSS, District Judge Plaintiff Avrohom Sebrow has brought suit against ER Solutions, Inc., alleging a violation of the Federal Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA"), 15 U.S.C. § 1629 et seq., which prohibits debt collectors from engaging in abusive, deceptive, and unfair practices. Plaintiff brings this suit as a putative class action on behalf of all similarly situated consumers. Plaintiff has moved for summary judgment, and defendant

  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 345,981 times   922 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 328,775 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  13. Section 1331 - Federal question

    28 U.S.C. § 1331   Cited 97,434 times   134 Legal Analyses
    Finding that in order to invoke federal question jurisdiction, a plaintiff's claims must arise "under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States."
  14. Rule 4 - Summons

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 4   Cited 69,012 times   122 Legal Analyses
    Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time
  15. Section 157 - Procedures

    28 U.S.C. § 157   Cited 51,405 times   78 Legal Analyses
    Determining the validity, extent, or priority of liens
  16. Section 1391 - Venue generally

    28 U.S.C. § 1391   Cited 27,824 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Finding that venue lies where a "substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim" occurred
  17. Section 158 - Appeals

    28 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 18,116 times   57 Legal Analyses
    Granting district courts appellate jurisdiction over "final judgments, orders, and decrees" of bankruptcy courts
  18. Section 1692 - Congressional findings and declaration of purpose

    15 U.S.C. § 1692   Cited 14,998 times   139 Legal Analyses
    Finding that abusive debt-collection practices lead to "personal bankruptcies," "marital instability," "loss of jobs," and "invasions of individual privacy"
  19. Section 1746 - Unsworn declarations under penalty of perjury

    28 U.S.C. § 1746   Cited 10,033 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Permitting the use of declarations instead
  20. Section 1692e - False or misleading representations

    15 U.S.C. § 1692e   Cited 6,926 times   108 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting false representation of the "character, amount, or legal status of a debt"
  21. Section 3 CCR 714-1-F-2

    3 Colo. Code Regs. § 714-1-F-2   Cited 7 times

    The Board or its Executive Secretary may issue a Temporary License pursuant to Section 12-51.5-103(3)(f), C.R.S., to applicants who are eligible for such a license upon receipt of a complete application including all fees, fingerprint card, and all parts of the application being filled out and signed. 3 CCR 714-1-F-2