Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc.

Holding that a plaintiff must establish "that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm"

Medimmune, Inc. v. GenenTech, Inc.

Holding "the phrase 'case of actual controversy' in the Act refers to the types of 'Cases' and 'Controversies' that are justiciable under Article III"

United States v. Salerno

Holding that "extensive safeguards" are necessary "to repel a facial challenge"

New York State Blue Cross Plans v. Travelers Ins

Holding that a statute imposing a surcharge on "[p]atients served by commercial insurers providing in-patient hospital coverage on an expense-incurred basis, by self-insured funds directly reimbursing hospitals, and by certain workers' compensation, volunteer firefighters' benefit, ambulance workers' benefit, and no-fault motor vehicle insurance funds" . . . "cannot be said to make 'reference to' ERISA plans in any manner" because the surcharge applied "regardless of whether the commercial coverage or membership, respectively, [wa]s ultimately secured by an ERISA plan, private purchase, or otherwise"

San Diego Unions v. Garmon

Holding that "the States as well as the federal court must defer to the exclusive competence of the National Labor Relations Board" if "an activity is arguably subject to § 7 or § 8 of the [NLRA]"

Farmer v. Carpenters

Holding that an otherwise preempted claim could be prosecuted in state or federal court if the conduct alleged was sufficiently outrageous

Sears, Roebuck Co. v. Carpenters

Holding that both state and federal courts must defer to the National Labor Relations Board when an activity is arguably protected under § 7 or prohibited by § 8 of the NLRA

Linn v. Plant Guard Workers

Holding as preempted all defamation actions in labor disputes except those published with actual malice

Machinists v. Wisconsin Emp. Rel. Comm'n

Holding that state law is preempted where it would upset the congressionally defined balance of power between management and labor by regulating activity Congress deliberately left unregulated

Malone v. White Motor Corp.

Rejecting preemption argument for statute requiring a severance payment for employees who lacked express severance contracts

Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355

Section 159 - Representatives and elections

Granting a bargaining unit the exclusive right to represent employees in it

Section 44-2012 - [Repealed]