47 Cited authorities

  1. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 273,590 times   368 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 218,869 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"
  3. Goodman v. Praxair

    494 F.3d 458 (4th Cir. 2007)   Cited 1,796 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the district court erred by dismissing the complaint under Rule 12(b) as time-barred where the complaint did not allege facts sufficiently clear to conclude that the statute of limitations had run
  4. Barry Aviation v. Land O'Lakes Mun. Airport

    377 F.3d 682 (7th Cir. 2004)   Cited 504 times
    Finding that the resolution of the statute of limitations comes after the complaint stage
  5. First Chi. Intern. v. United Exch. Co.

    836 F.2d 1375 (D.C. Cir. 1988)   Cited 381 times
    Holding that appellant's failure to file an affidavit specifically outlining the facts that it hoped to uncover with additional discovery did not preclude it from challenging the summary judgment order because other filings were sufficient to notify the district court of the need for further discovery
  6. Americable Intnl., Inc. v. Dept. of Navy

    129 F.3d 1271 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 85 times
    Holding that summary judgment "ordinarily ‘is proper only after the plaintiff has been given adequate time for discovery’ " (quoting First Chicago Int'l v. United Exch. Co., 836 F.2d 1375, 1380 (D.C. Cir. 1988) )
  7. Beeton v. D.C

    779 A.2d 918 (D.C. 2001)   Cited 66 times
    Finding plaintiff did not prove actual malice where "there was no evidence presented to establish any negative relationship between [plaintiff and defendants]."
  8. Mazloum v. District of Columbia Metro. Police

    522 F. Supp. 2d 24 (D.D.C. 2007)   Cited 47 times
    Holding that the Domino's decision only pertained to the contract clause of the statute and that a plaintiff asserting an equal benefits clause claim need not rely on a contractual relationship
  9. Smith v. District of Columbia

    413 F.3d 86 (D.C. Cir. 2005)   Cited 48 times
    Holding that the District of Columbia had a constitutional duty of care to an adjudicated delinquent youth who was committed to the District's custody involuntarily and noting that “formal indicia” of commitment were relevant to whether a “special relationship” existed
  10. Brown v. United States

    742 F.2d 1498 (D.C. Cir. 1984)   Cited 86 times
    Holding that noncompliance with Section 12–309"cannot bar [the plaintiff's] federal claims"
  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 333,232 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  12. Section 2000e - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e   Cited 52,072 times   130 Legal Analyses
    Granting EEOC authority to issue procedural regulations to carry out Title VII provisions
  13. Rule 6 - Computing and Extending Time; Time for Motion Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 6   Cited 50,129 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "if the last day [of a period] is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday."
  14. Section 2-1401.01 - Intent of Council

    D.C. Code § 2-1401.01   Cited 290 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Protecting against discrimination on the basis of "race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, personal appearance, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, familial status, family responsibilities, matriculation, political affiliation, genetic information, disability, source of income, status as a victim of intrafamily offense, and place of residence or business"
  15. Section 12-309 - Actions against District of Columbia for unliquidated damages; time for notice

    D.C. Code § 12-309   Cited 272 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Requiring notice within 6 months of the approximate time, place, cause, and circumstances of the injury
  16. Section 2-1403.16 - Private cause of action

    D.C. Code § 2-1403.16   Cited 172 times
    Stating that "where the [DCOHR] has dismissed complaint on the grounds of administrative convenience, or where the complainant has withdrawn a complaint, such person shall maintain all rights to bring suit as if no complaint has been filed"
  17. Section 6-210 - Terms for sale of Obligations

    D.C. Code § 6-210   Cited 21 times
    Incorporating § 6-2107(b)
  18. Section 2-1411.01 - Establishment of the Office of Human Rights

    D.C. Code § 2-1411.01   Cited 2 times

    (a) Pursuant to § 1-204.04(b), there is hereby established, in the Executive Branch of the government of the District of Columbia, an Office of Human Rights under the supervision of a Director, who shall carry out the functions and authorities assigned to the Office. The Office of Human Rights ("Office") is established as a separate agency as of October 1, 1999. (b) The Director shall have full authority over the Office and all functions and personnel assigned thereto, including the power to redelegate