22 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 252,784 times   279 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 266,697 times   365 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "
  3. Thompson v. Real Estate Mortg. Network

    748 F.3d 142 (3d Cir. 2014)   Cited 503 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the district court may have been "correct" in not finding a "joint employment" relationship "if one considers only the name of the payor appearing on [plaintiff]'s pay stubs. But [plaintiff] alleges more. The Amended Complaint states that an employee of [defendant] conducted Thompson's training . . . indicating that [defendant] had at least some authority to 'promulgate work rules and assignments'"
  4. Henry v. Farmer City State Bank

    808 F.2d 1228 (7th Cir. 1986)   Cited 486 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a sheriff who was acting pursuant to an official court order to enforce a validly entered judgment was entitled to quasi-judicial immunity
  5. Haybarger v. Lawrence Cty. Adult Prob. & Parole

    667 F.3d 408 (3d Cir. 2012)   Cited 217 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding supervisor was FMLA employer because "but for the substantial authority wielded by [the supervisor], [the employer] would not have exercised his ultimate authority to fire [the employee]"
  6. Hickton v. Enter. Holdings, Inc. (In re Enter. Rent–A–Car Wage & Hour Emp't Practices Litig.)

    683 F.3d 462 (3d Cir. 2012)   Cited 212 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding an alleged employer must exercise "significant control" to be considered a joint employer under the FLSA
  7. Walton v. Eaton Corp.

    563 F.2d 66 (3d Cir. 1977)   Cited 526 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding a plaintiff has "no right to maintain two separate actions involving the same subject matter at the same time in the same court and against the same defendant"
  8. Davis v. Sun Oil Company

    148 F.3d 606 (6th Cir. 1998)   Cited 104 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that federal courts do not have exclusive jurisdiction over RCRA citizen suits
  9. Tracy v. NVR, Inc.

    667 F. Supp. 2d 244 (W.D.N.Y. 2009)   Cited 40 times
    Finding that "mere boilerplate allegations that an individual meets the various prongs of the economic reality test stated solely upon information and belief and without any supporting details—essentially ‘a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action’—are insufficient to raise plaintiffs' right to relief ‘above a speculative level’ with respect to that individual's liability as an employer under the FLSA" (quoting Twombly , 550 U.S. at 555, 127 S.Ct. 1955 )
  10. Sensormatic Security Corp. v. Sensormatic Electronics Corp.

    329 F. Supp. 2d 574 (D. Md. 2004)   Cited 46 times
    Denying a motion to dismiss with respect to portion of the action that did not constitute claim-splitting, therefore allowing the second action to proceed
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 345,981 times   922 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Rule 15 - Amended and Supplemental Pleadings

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 15   Cited 90,557 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding that, per N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1024, New York law provides a more forgiving principle for relation back in the context of naming John Doe defendants described with particularity in the complaint