§Why CasetextPricing

HTC Corporation et al v. Technology Properties Limited et al

RESPONSE

13 Cited authorities

  1. Hensley v. Eckerhart

    461 U.S. 424 (1983)   Cited 21,648 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding a civil-rights plaintiff can recover attorney's fees for claims that "involve a common core of facts or will be based on related legal theories," even if only one of those claims arises under a fee-shifting statute

  2. Marmo v. Tyson Fresh Meats

    457 F.3d 748 (8th Cir. 2006)   Cited 668 times
    Holding the district court acted within its discretion in excluding the testimony of a toxicologist on medical causation where the toxicologist did not exclude confounding factors leaving open the possibility of competing causes

  3. Assoc. of Mexican-Am. v. State of Calif

    231 F.3d 572 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 792 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding the same where the indirect employer, the State of California, implemented an allegedly discriminatory skills test that was a prerequisite for the plaintiffs to gain employment with their direct employers, the school districts

  4. Save Our Valley v. Sound Transit

    335 F.3d 932 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 498 times
    Holding that the losing party bears the burden of overcoming the presumption of awarding costs to the prevailing party

  5. Ruiz v. A.B. Chance Co.

    234 F.3d 654 (Fed. Cir. 2000)   Cited 238 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that district court erred in failing to consider evidence of secondary considerations

  6. Campbell v. National Passenger Railroad Corporation

    718 F. Supp. 2d 1093 (N.D. Cal. 2010)   Cited 48 times
    Holding reasonable $700 hourly rate for lead counsel, civil rights attorney practicing since 1982; finding support for "a market rate from $380 to &775 per hour for experienced employment and civil rights attorneys in the Northern District" for the years 2006-2009

  7. Subscription T. V. v. S. Cal. Theatre Owners

    576 F.2d 230 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 91 times
    Holding defendants Immune from antitrust liability under Noerr-Pennington even though their petitioning led to the passage of an unconstitutional initiative

  8. Popeil Brothers v. Schick Electric, Inc.

    516 F.2d 772 (7th Cir. 1975)   Cited 97 times
    In Popeil Brothers, supra, the court affirmed a denial of defendant's motion for award of expenses and fees under Rule 37(c).

  9. Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus, Inc.

    697 F. Supp. 2d 1139 (N.D. Cal. 2010)   Cited 22 times
    Finding the transcript costs by other parties taxable because Hynix failed to show that the depositions of the other parties' witnesses were "so unique" to their claims as opposed to the common claims that it was not "for any purpose in connection with the case"

  10. Ortho-McNeil Pharm. v. Mylan Laboratories

    569 F.3d 1353 (Fed. Cir. 2009)   Cited 20 times
    Holding that in a patent infringement action the "prevailing party may receive only one satisfaction of costs"

  11. Rule 54 - Judgment; Costs

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 54   Cited 41,392 times   142 Legal Analyses
    Holding party seeking fees may additionally seek "nontaxable expenses"

  12. Rule 11 - Signing Pleadings, Motions, and Other Papers; Representations to the Court; Sanctions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 11   Cited 35,955 times   145 Legal Analyses
    Holding an "unrepresented party" to the same standard as an attorney