In re Global Crossing Securities and Erisa Litigation
225 F.R.D. 436 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) Cited 227 timesFinding on facts of that case that “when judged against the realistic, rather than theoretical, potential for recovery after trial, the settlement amount is extremely beneficial”
In re Terazosin Hydrochloride Antitrust Litigation
203 F.R.D. 551 (S.D. Fla. 2001) Cited 141 timesHolding that individual named plaintiffs had standing to assert claims in states in which purchases were made and where the plans reimbursed those purchases
In re Polaroid Erisa Litigation
240 F.R.D. 65 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) Cited 28 times 1 Legal AnalysesDeclining to consider whether former employees had standing under ERISA based on the “reasonable expectation” prong where the “[p]laintiffs admit[ted] that they [had] no reasonable expectation of returning to [the defendant] as employees.”
Nowak v. Ford Motor Co.
240 F.R.D. 355 (E.D. Mich. 2006) Cited 16 timesAppointing two law firms as interim co-lead counsel
Rule 23 - Class Actions
Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 Cited 35,874 times 1249 Legal AnalysesHolding that, to certify a class, the court must find that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members"