38 Cited authorities

Ashcroft v. Iqbal
556 U.S. 662 (2009) Cited 255,498 times 280 Legal Analyses
Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable
Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly
550 U.S. 544 (2007) Cited 269,239 times 367 Legal Analyses
Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "
Whren v. United States
517 U.S. 806 (1996) Cited 8,664 times 38 Legal Analyses
Holding that, upon observing traffic violation, officer may stop vehicle regardless of his subjective motivations, "as long as the circumstances, viewed objectively, justify that action"
Illinois v. Krull
480 U.S. 340 (1987) Cited 1,067 times 19 Legal Analyses
Holding that question of whether statute was unconstitutional was not before the court and that officer's reliance on statute was objectively reasonable and good faith exception applied
Branzburg v. Hayes
408 U.S. 665 (1972) Cited 1,812 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that government need not “demonstrate some ‘compelling need’ for a newsman's testimony”
Shelton v. Tucker
364 U.S. 479 (1960) Cited 1,189 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that disclosure of every organization teachers had joined in the previous five years was not rationally related to the State's interest in determining their fitness and competency
U.S. v. Flores-Montano
541 U.S. 149 (2004) Cited 211 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that at the border a vehicle’s gas tank may be disassembled and searched without any suspicion
United States v. 12 200-ft. Reels of Super 8mm. Film
413 U.S. 123 (1973) Cited 337 times
Holding that Congress can constitutionally prohibit the importation of obscene material from abroad, even if it is imported for personal use rather than for commercial distribution
U.S. v. Irving
432 F.3d 401 (2d Cir. 2005) Cited 286 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that twenty-two month old information in affidavit in support of warrant to search computer for child pornography was not stale
Talley v. California
362 U.S. 60 (1960) Cited 325 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding anonymity protected under the First Amendment because forced "identification and fear of reprisal might deter perfectly peaceful discussions of public matters of importance"
Rule 56 - Summary Judgment
Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 Cited 330,185 times 158 Legal Analyses
Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
Section 1461 - Mailing obscene or crime-inciting matter
18 U.S.C. § 1461 Cited 421 times 9 Legal Analyses
Mailing obscene matter

House v. Napolitano et al

38 Cited authorities

Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable

Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "

Holding that, upon observing traffic violation, officer may stop vehicle regardless of his subjective motivations, "as long as the circumstances, viewed objectively, justify that action"

Holding that question of whether statute was unconstitutional was not before the court and that officer's reliance on statute was objectively reasonable and good faith exception applied

Holding that government need not “demonstrate some ‘compelling need’ for a newsman's testimony”

Holding that disclosure of every organization teachers had joined in the previous five years was not rationally related to the State's interest in determining their fitness and competency

Holding that at the border a vehicle’s gas tank may be disassembled and searched without any suspicion

Holding that Congress can constitutionally prohibit the importation of obscene material from abroad, even if it is imported for personal use rather than for commercial distribution

Holding that twenty-two month old information in affidavit in support of warrant to search computer for child pornography was not stale

Holding anonymity protected under the First Amendment because forced "identification and fear of reprisal might deter perfectly peaceful discussions of public matters of importance"

Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

Mailing obscene matter