55 Cited authorities

Ashcroft v. Iqbal
556 U.S. 662 (2009) Cited 255,498 times 280 Legal Analyses
Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable
United States v. Place
462 U.S. 696 (1983) Cited 3,281 times 26 Legal Analyses
Holding 90-minute detention of luggage unreasonable based on nature of interference with person's travels and lack of diligence of police
Buckley v. Valeo
424 U.S. 1 (1976) Cited 3,423 times 37 Legal Analyses
Holding that a public financing law does not "abridge, restrict, or censor" expression
Roberts v. United States Jaycees
468 U.S. 609 (1984) Cited 2,014 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that infringement of the right to associate "may be justified by regulations adopted to serve compelling state interests, unrelated to the suppression of ideas, that cannot be achieved through means significantly less restrictive of associational freedoms"
Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union
521 U.S. 844 (1997) Cited 991 times 13 Legal Analyses
Holding parts of § 223 unconstitutional under the First Amendment
Ocasio-Hernández v. Fortuño-Burset
640 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2011) Cited 2,159 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that “an adequate complaint must provide fair notice to the defendants and state a facially plausible legal claim” (citing Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009)), and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 167 L.Ed.2d 929
United States v. Montoya de Hernandez
473 U.S. 531 (1985) Cited 901 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that overnight detention for monitored bowel movement followed by rectal examination is "beyond the scope of a routine customs search" and permissible under the border exception only with reasonable suspicion
N. A. A. C. P. v. Alabama
357 U.S. 449 (1958) Cited 1,961 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[c]ompelled disclosure of membership in an organization engaged in advocacy of particular beliefs" may violate the First Amendment
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
436 U.S. 547 (1978) Cited 914 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Fourth Amendment allows for warrants where "the owner or possessor of the place to be searched is not . . . reasonably suspected of criminal involvement"
Almeida-Sanchez v. United States
413 U.S. 266 (1973) Cited 928 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that a search of a vehicle could be conducted without consent only if there was probable cause or a judicial warrant authorizing the search
Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 Cited 348,810 times 931 Legal Analyses
Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
Section 1461 - Mailing obscene or crime-inciting matter
18 U.S.C. § 1461 Cited 421 times 9 Legal Analyses
Mailing obscene matter

House v. Napolitano et al

55 Cited authorities

Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable

Holding 90-minute detention of luggage unreasonable based on nature of interference with person's travels and lack of diligence of police

Holding that a public financing law does not "abridge, restrict, or censor" expression

Holding that infringement of the right to associate "may be justified by regulations adopted to serve compelling state interests, unrelated to the suppression of ideas, that cannot be achieved through means significantly less restrictive of associational freedoms"

Holding parts of § 223 unconstitutional under the First Amendment

Holding that “an adequate complaint must provide fair notice to the defendants and state a facially plausible legal claim” (citing Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009)), and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 167 L.Ed.2d 929

Holding that overnight detention for monitored bowel movement followed by rectal examination is "beyond the scope of a routine customs search" and permissible under the border exception only with reasonable suspicion

Holding that "[c]ompelled disclosure of membership in an organization engaged in advocacy of particular beliefs" may violate the First Amendment

Holding that the Fourth Amendment allows for warrants where "the owner or possessor of the place to be searched is not . . . reasonably suspected of criminal involvement"

Holding that a search of a vehicle could be conducted without consent only if there was probable cause or a judicial warrant authorizing the search

Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

Mailing obscene matter