468 U.S. 609 (1984) Cited 2,016 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that infringement of the right to associate "may be justified by regulations adopted to serve compelling state interests, unrelated to the suppression of ideas, that cannot be achieved through means significantly less restrictive of associational freedoms"
Holding that “an adequate complaint must provide fair notice to the defendants and state a facially plausible legal claim” (citing Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009)), and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 167 L.Ed.2d 929
473 U.S. 531 (1985) Cited 901 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that overnight detention for monitored bowel movement followed by rectal examination is "beyond the scope of a routine customs search" and permissible under the border exception only with reasonable suspicion
436 U.S. 547 (1978) Cited 915 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Fourth Amendment allows for warrants where "the owner or possessor of the place to be searched is not . . . reasonably suspected of criminal involvement"