59 Cited authorities

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 216,328 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"
  2. Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife

    504 U.S. 555 (1992)   Cited 27,840 times   138 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"
  3. Clapper v. Amnesty Int'l USA

    568 U.S. 398 (2013)   Cited 3,057 times   169 Legal Analyses
    Holding that respondents could not establish injury by relying on a "speculative chain of possibilities"
  4. Summers v. Earth Island Inst.

    555 U.S. 488 (2009)   Cited 3,001 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that supplementation of the district court record to receive affidavits from the organization's members was not permitted "in the circumstances here: after the trial is over, judgment has been entered, and a notice of appeal has been filed"
  5. Los Angeles v. Lyons

    461 U.S. 95 (1983)   Cited 7,506 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding there is no justiciable controversy where plaintiff had once been subjected to a chokehold
  6. Allen v. Wright

    468 U.S. 737 (1984)   Cited 4,756 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, even when plaintiffs allege "one of the most serious injuries recognized in our legal system," it's not justiciable where "the chain of causation between the challenged Government conduct and the asserted injury are far too weak for the chain as a whole to sustain respondents' standing"
  7. Hollingsworth v. Perry

    570 U.S. 693 (2013)   Cited 947 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that proponents of a ballot initiative who "ha[d] no role ... in the enforcement of " the initiative and were not "agents of the State" lacked standing to defend it on appeal
  8. Leocal v. Ashcroft

    543 U.S. 1 (2004)   Cited 1,153 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "DUI causing serious bodily injury" is not a "crime of violence"
  9. O'Shea v. Littleton

    414 U.S. 488 (1974)   Cited 4,083 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[p]ast exposure to illegal conduct does not in itself show a present case or controversy regarding injunctive relief ... if unaccompanied by any continuing, present adverse effects"
  10. Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville

    405 U.S. 156 (1972)   Cited 1,522 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding vague an ordinance that punished “vagrants,” defined to include “rogues and vagabonds,” “persons who use juggling,” and “common night walkers”
  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 328,775 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  12. Rule 23 - Class Actions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 23   Cited 34,939 times   1234 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, to certify a class, the court must find that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members"
  13. Section 2510 - Definitions

    18 U.S.C. § 2510   Cited 4,250 times   78 Legal Analyses
    Defining "[i]nvestigative or law enforcement officer" as an officer "empowered by law to conduct investigations of or to make arrests for [certain] offenses . . . and any attorney authorized by law to prosecute or participate in the prosecution of such offenses"
  14. Section 2701 - Unlawful access to stored communications

    18 U.S.C. § 2701   Cited 1,324 times   135 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable any person who "intentionally accesses without authorization a facility through which an electronic communication service is provided ... and thereby obtains, alters, or prevents authorized access to a wire or electronic communication while it is in electronic storage"
  15. Section 1859 - Intention of Legislature or intention of parties in construction of statute or instrument

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1859   Cited 577 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Providing in part: "In the construction of a statute the intention of the Legislature . . . is to be pursued, if possible; and when a general and particular provision are inconsistent, the latter is paramount to the former. So a particular intent will control a general one that is inconsistent with it."
  16. Section 2702 - Voluntary disclosure of customer communications or records

    18 U.S.C. § 2702   Cited 344 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Restricting use of Internet subscriber information without consent
  17. Section 630 - Legislative declarations

    Cal. Pen. Code § 630   Cited 277 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Noting that CIPA was passed "to protect the right of privacy of the people of this state"
  18. Section 631 - Unlawful tapping

    Cal. Pen. Code § 631   Cited 217 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting "any person who . . . makes any unauthorized connection . . . or who willfully and without the consent of all parties to the communication . . . reads, or attempts to read, or to learn the contents or meaning of any message is in transit or passing over any wire, line, or cable . . . "
  19. Section 1524.2 - Search warrant for records in possession of foreign corporation that provides electronic communication services or remote computing services

    Cal. Pen. Code § 1524.2   Cited 8 times   1 Legal Analyses

    (a)As used in this section, the following terms have the following meanings: (1)The terms "electronic communication services" and "remote computing services" shall be construed in accordance with the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 in Chapter 121 (commencing with Section 2701) of Part I of Title 18 of the United States Code. This section does not apply to corporations that do not provide those services to the general public. (2)An "adverse result" occurs when notification of the existence

  20. Section 629.51 - [Effective until 1/1/2030] Definitions; applicability of chapter

    Cal. Pen. Code § 629.51   Cited 5 times   2 Legal Analyses

    (a)For the purposes of this chapter, the following terms have the following meanings: (1)"Wire communication" means any aural transfer made in whole or in part through the use of facilities for the transmission of communications by the aid of wire, cable, or other like connection between the point of origin and the point of reception (including the use of a like connection in a switching station), furnished or operated by any person engaged in providing or operating these facilities for the transmission