54 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 236,273 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"
  2. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio

    475 U.S. 574 (1986)   Cited 113,147 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, on summary judgment, antitrust plaintiffs "must show that the inference of conspiracy is reasonable in light of the competing inferences of independent action or collusive action that could not have harmed" them
  3. Department of Interior v. Klamath Water Users Prot. A.

    532 U.S. 1 (2001)   Cited 1,009 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the determination that records are not inter- or intra-agency "rules out any application of Exemption 5"
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

    421 U.S. 132 (1975)   Cited 2,041 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that FOIA does not compel agencies to write or create material to explain disclosed documents
  5. Brayton v. Office of the United States Trade Representative

    641 F.3d 521 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 571 times
    Holding that even if the plaintiff was eligible to receive attorney fees, he was not entitled to an award because the government's initial position refusing the FOIA request was legally correct
  6. Larson v. Department of State

    565 F.3d 857 (D.C. Cir. 2009)   Cited 598 times
    Holding that information provided by CHS that could reveal the identity of intelligence source was properly withheld
  7. Vaughn v. Rosen

    484 F.2d 820 (D.C. Cir. 1973)   Cited 1,966 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an indexing system was necessary in FOIA cases to " assure that a party's right to information is not submerged beneath governmental obfuscation and mischaracterization, and permit the Court system effectively and efficiently to evaluate the factual nature of disputed information."
  8. Sussman v. U.S. Marshals

    494 F.3d 1106 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   Cited 553 times
    Holding that the Act grants access to only those records that are “about” the requestor, “not to all information pertaining to them that happens to be contained in a system of records”
  9. American Civil Lib. v. U.S. of Dept. of Def.

    628 F.3d 612 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 449 times
    Holding that documents must have been made public through an "official and documented disclosure by the government"
  10. Coastal States Gas Corp. v. Dept. of Energy

    617 F.2d 854 (D.C. Cir. 1980)   Cited 1,184 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when agency auditors communicate information from third parties to the agency's regional counsel and ask for legal advice, the regional counsel's written responses containing "neutral, objective analyses of agency regulations" are not privileged
  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 328,826 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  12. Section 552 - Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedings

    5 U.S.C. § 552   Cited 12,171 times   556 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Court's entering of a “Stipulation and Order” approving the parties' terms of dismissal did not amount to a “court-ordered consent decree” that would render the plaintiff the prevailing party
  13. Section 1746 - Unsworn declarations under penalty of perjury

    28 U.S.C. § 1746   Cited 10,035 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Permitting the use of declarations instead
  14. Section 551 - Definitions

    5 U.S.C. § 551   Cited 4,745 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the definition set out in the APA
  15. Section 552a - Records maintained on individuals

    5 U.S.C. § 552a   Cited 4,429 times   47 Legal Analyses
    Finding that it is a Department of Justice component that has as its principal function the enforcement of criminal laws includ[ing] correctional authorities