§Why CasetextPricing

Hearst Stations Inc. v. Aereo, Inc.

MEMORANDUM in Support re MOTION to Transfer Case to Southern District of New York.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios, Inc.

    464 U.S. 417 (1984)   Cited 984 times   28 Legal Analyses
    Holding identical copying of videotapes under unique circumstances of case “[did] not have its ordinary effect of militating against a finding of fair use”

  2. Cont'l Grain Co. v. Barge FBL-585

    364 U.S. 19 (1960)   Cited 1,079 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 1404 permits transfer of in rem claims along with in personam claims to more convenient district, even though in rem claim standing alone could not have been brought in transferee district

  3. Coady v. Ashcraft Gerel

    223 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2000)   Cited 227 times
    Holding that “[n]ot only does the burden of proof rest with the party seeking to transfer; there is a strong presumption in favor of the plaintiff's choice of forum.”

  4. WNET, Thirteen v. Aero, Inc.

    712 F.3d 676 (2d Cir. 2013)   Cited 27 times   9 Legal Analyses

    Docket Nos. 12–2786–cv, 12–2807–cv. 2013-04-1 WNET, THIRTEEN, Fox Television Stations, Inc., Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, WPIX, Inc., Univision Television Group, Inc., The Univision Network Limited Partnership, and Public Broadcasting Service, Plaintiffs–Counter–Defendants–Appellants, v. AEREO, INC., f/k/a Bamboom Labs, Inc., Defendant–Counter–Claimant–Appellee. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., Disney Enterprises, Inc., CBS Broadcasting Inc., CBS Studios Inc., NBCUniversal Media

  5. Penguin Group

    640 F.3d 497 (2d Cir. 2011)   Cited 27 times
    Holding that the copyright holder suffered injury “within the state” even though the infringing acts occurred outside of New York

  6. Am. Broad. Cos. v. Aereo, Inc.

    874 F. Supp. 2d 373 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)   Cited 15 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Describing the technology actually used by Aereo

  7. Converse Inc. v. Reebok International Ltd.

    328 F. Supp. 2d 166 (D. Mass. 2004)   Cited 20 times
    Adopting the magistrate judge's finding that the failure "to comply with Rule 7.1 is an 'offense ... that harms the District Court as much as [opposing counsel].'"

  8. F.A.I. Electronics Corp. v. Chambers

    944 F. Supp. 77 (D. Mass. 1996)   Cited 19 times
    Holding that although no single factor is dispositive, a court should consider: " the convenience of the parties, the convenience of the witnesses, the relative ease of access to sources of proof, the availability of process to compel attendance of unwilling witnesses, cost of obtaining willing witnesses, and any practical problems associated with trying the case most expeditiously and inexpensively."

  9. Tovar v. Indiana

    CIVIL NO. 2:12-cv-175-DBH (D. Me. Aug. 9, 2012)   Cited 1 times
    Transferring case to transferee court that was "familiar with the underlying dispute"

  10. Falken Industries, Ltd. v. Johansen

    360 F. Supp. 2d 208 (D. Mass. 2005)   Cited 6 times

    04-CV-12479-MEL. March 7, 2005 Carlo Cellai, Cellai Denauw, LLP, Boston, MA, for Falken Industries, Ltd. Roy Janis, Plaintiffs. Kurt B. Fliegauf, Conn, Kavanaugh, Rosenthal, Peisch Ford, LLP, Boston, MA, for Christian Johansen, Patrick Sautin, Defendants. Thomas E. Peisch, Amy C. Stewart, Conn, Kavanaugh, Rosenthal, Peisch Ford, LLP, Boston, MA, Dustin B. Rawlin, Jones Day, Cleveland, OH, for Christian Johansen, Patrick Sautin, Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MORRIS LASKER, Senior District Judge

  11. Section 1404 - Change of venue

    28 U.S.C. § 1404   Cited 29,082 times   191 Legal Analyses
    Granting Class Plaintiffs' motion to transfer action in order to "facilitate a unified settlement approval process together with the class action cases in" In re Amex ASR

  12. Section 1391 - Venue generally

    28 U.S.C. § 1391   Cited 28,884 times   199 Legal Analyses
    Finding that venue lies where a "substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim" occurred

  13. Section 301 - Preemption with respect to other laws

    17 U.S.C. § 301   Cited 1,429 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Stating that when "legal or equitable rights ... are equivalent to any of the exclusive rights within the general scope of copyright ... no person is entitled to any such right or equivalent right in any such work under the common law or statutes of any State"

  14. Section 307 - Licenses

    47 U.S.C. § 307   Cited 203 times
    Pending a final decision on a license renewal application, the Commission shall continue such license in effect