11 Cited authorities

  1. Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.

    459 U.S. 56 (1982)   Cited 3,190 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the filing of a notice of appeal "confers jurisdiction on the court of appeals and divests the district court of its control over those aspects of the case involved in the appeal"
  2. N.Y. St. Nat. Organization for Women v. Terry

    886 F.2d 1339 (2d Cir. 1989)   Cited 647 times
    Holding that coercive sanctions should be paid to court and modifying contempt order accordingly
  3. Wisconsin Mut. Ins. Co. v. U.S.

    441 F.3d 502 (7th Cir. 2006)   Cited 54 times
    Holding that, in a case where multiple litigants intend to file notices of appeal, the filing of an appeal by one litigant does not divest the district court of jurisdiction over the claims involving the other litigants
  4. Boumediene v. Bush

    476 F.3d 981 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   Cited 41 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding alien detained as enemy combatant at Guantánamo Bay has no constitutional right to writ of habeas corpus
  5. Taylor v. Sterrett

    640 F.2d 663 (5th Cir. 1981)   Cited 81 times
    Finding that a district court is divested of jurisdiction upon the filing of a notice of appeal with respect to any matters involved in the appeal, whether that appeal is from a final judgment or an interlocutory order
  6. Venezia v. Robinson

    16 F.3d 209 (7th Cir. 1994)   Cited 51 times
    Noting that a preliminary injunction cannot survive dismissal of the complaint
  7. Webb v. GAF Corp.

    78 F.3d 53 (2d Cir. 1996)   Cited 41 times
    Holding entry of a permanent injunction moots an appeal from a preliminary injunction
  8. Maxwell v. Snow

    409 F.3d 354 (D.C. Cir. 2005)   Cited 26 times
    Finding "patently frivolous" the plaintiff's "requests for declarations that laws passed by Congress [did] not apply to [him] as a `sovereign citizen of the Union of the State of Texas'"
  9. In re Guantanamo Detainee Cases

    344 F. Supp. 2d 174 (D.D.C. 2004)   Cited 22 times
    Permitting review of sensitive evidence through issuance of a protective order
  10. Deering Milliken, Inc. v. F.T.C.

    647 F.2d 1124 (D.C. Cir. 1978)   Cited 33 times
    Recognizing this distinction