15 Cited authorities

Bousley v. United States
523 U.S. 614 (1998) Cited 13,643 times 10 Legal Analyses
Holding that the rule announced in Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 116 S.Ct. 501, 133 L.Ed.2d 472, which narrowed the scope of the term "use" in § 924(c), applied retroactively
Strickler v. Greene
527 U.S. 263 (1999) Cited 6,401 times 20 Legal Analyses
Holding that a newspaper article detailing that a witness had been interviewed by the police did not suffice to put a defendant's lawyer on notice that records and evidence concerning the witness existed and had been suppressed
Clapper v. Amnesty Int'l USA
568 U.S. 398 (2013) Cited 3,069 times 169 Legal Analyses
Holding that respondents could not establish injury by relying on a "speculative chain of possibilities"
Brady v. Maryland
373 U.S. 83 (1963) Cited 43,539 times 133 Legal Analyses
Holding that the prosecution violates due process when it suppresses material, favorable evidence
Youngblood v. West Virginia
547 U.S. 867 (2006) Cited 412 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that a Brady violation occurs "when the government fails to turn over even evidence that is ‘known only to police investigators and not to the prosecutor’ "
United States v. Duggan
743 F.2d 59 (2d Cir. 1984) Cited 143 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding defense of public authority requires government agent to have actual authority to authorize statutory violation
United States v. Belfield
692 F.2d 141 (D.C. Cir. 1982) Cited 65 times 1 Legal Analyses
Affirming that the "decision to pass upon the legality of the surveillance based upon an ex parte examination of an in camera" submission "[i]s in keeping with the procedures contemplated by Congress when it enacted FISA."
U.S. v. Ghailani
751 F. Supp. 2d 498 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) Cited 4 times
Rejecting defendant's contention that privilege was waived as to “communications tending to undercut the government's stated justification for the delay” in bringing him to trial because, even though communications were “pertinent,” government did not seek to rely on communications in question
United States v. Megahey
553 F. Supp. 1180 (E.D.N.Y. 1982) Cited 24 times
Finding that defendants "made no showing whatsover to support their allegation that [defendant's] first amendment rights may have been abridged by the authorization or conduct of the FISA surveillance"
Section 2255 - Federal custody; remedies on motion attacking sentence
28 U.S.C. § 2255 Cited 129,548 times 129 Legal Analyses
Adopting one-year limitations period for §2255 motions
Section 1101 - Definitions
8 U.S.C. § 1101 Cited 16,365 times 91 Legal Analyses
Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status
Section 1801 - Definitions
50 U.S.C. § 1801 Cited 280 times 10 Legal Analyses
Defining "United States person" to be a "citizen of the United States, an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence" or certain unincorporated associations or corporations with ties to the United States
Section 1806 - Use of information
50 U.S.C. § 1806 Cited 169 times 4 Legal Analyses
Allowing in camera , ex parte review of the legality of electronic surveillance under FISA Subchapter I if "the Attorney General files an affidavit under oath that disclosure or an adversary hearing would harm the national security of the United States"
Section 1881a - Procedures for targeting certain persons outside the United States other than United States persons
50 U.S.C. § 1881a Cited 75 times 11 Legal Analyses
Permitting review of FISA orders by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court
Section 1881e - Use of information acquired under this subchapter
50 U.S.C. § 1881e Cited 12 times
Stating that information acquired under § 702 is subject to the notice requirement in § 1806(c)

Hasbajrami v. United States of America

15 Cited authorities

Holding that the rule announced in Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 116 S.Ct. 501, 133 L.Ed.2d 472, which narrowed the scope of the term "use" in § 924(c), applied retroactively

Holding that a newspaper article detailing that a witness had been interviewed by the police did not suffice to put a defendant's lawyer on notice that records and evidence concerning the witness existed and had been suppressed

Holding that respondents could not establish injury by relying on a "speculative chain of possibilities"

Holding that the prosecution violates due process when it suppresses material, favorable evidence

Holding that a Brady violation occurs "when the government fails to turn over even evidence that is ‘known only to police investigators and not to the prosecutor’ "

Holding defense of public authority requires government agent to have actual authority to authorize statutory violation

Affirming that the "decision to pass upon the legality of the surveillance based upon an ex parte examination of an in camera" submission "[i]s in keeping with the procedures contemplated by Congress when it enacted FISA."

Finding that defendants "made no showing whatsover to support their allegation that [defendant's] first amendment rights may have been abridged by the authorization or conduct of the FISA surveillance"

Adopting one-year limitations period for §2255 motions

Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status

Defining "United States person" to be a "citizen of the United States, an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence" or certain unincorporated associations or corporations with ties to the United States

Allowing in camera , ex parte review of the legality of electronic surveillance under FISA Subchapter I if "the Attorney General files an affidavit under oath that disclosure or an adversary hearing would harm the national security of the United States"

Permitting review of FISA orders by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court

Stating that information acquired under § 702 is subject to the notice requirement in § 1806(c)