§Why CasetextPricing

Hasan v. American Express Centurion Bank

BRIEF in Opposition to 31 MOTION for Leave to Notify Court of Pertinent District of Colorado Opinion in Support of 9 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support Thereof

10 Cited authorities

  1. United Savings Assn. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest

    484 U.S. 365 (1988)   Cited 2,047 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 506(b) “deni [es] ... postpetition interest to undersecured creditors,” and recognizing “an apparent anomaly” that when a debtor proves solvent, 11 U.S.C. § 726 provides for post-petition interest on unsecured claims “but not on the secured portion of undersecured creditors' claims,” but concluding that these particular “inequitable effects ... are entirely avoidable, since an undersecured creditor is entitled to ‘surrender or waive his security and prove his entire claim as an unsecured one’ ”

  2. Ali v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons

    552 U.S. 214 (2008)   Cited 752 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding a Bureau of Prisons guard is a "law enforcement officer" under the Federal Tort Claims Act

  3. Reno v. Koray

    515 U.S. 50 (1995)   Cited 1,053 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that BOP program statements are entitled to "some deference" when they reflect a "permissible construction of the statute"

  4. Gomez v. United States

    490 U.S. 858 (1989)   Cited 981 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that jury selection is more akin to a dispositive matter and so could not be conducted by a magistrate

  5. Florida Dep't of Revenue v. Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc.

    554 U.S. 33 (2008)   Cited 232 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding the "federalism canon ... obliges us to construe [a statute]'s exemption narrowly"

  6. Legal Services Corporation v. Velazquez

    531 U.S. 533 (2001)   Cited 220 times
    Holding challenged funding condition on legal services unconstitutional because it "exclude[d] certain vital theories and ideas"

  7. Johnson v. Riddle

    305 F.3d 1107 (10th Cir. 2002)   Cited 391 times
    Holding that a mistake of state law could be a bona fide error

  8. Begala v. PNC Bank, Ohio, National Ass'n

    163 F.3d 948 (6th Cir. 1998)   Cited 91 times
    Holding that TILA "was enacted to promote the informed use of credit by consumers by requiring meaningful disclosure of credit terms"

  9. Citibank

    135 S.W.3d 545 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 11 times
    In Mincks, the credit card holders opened a credit card account using an application for personal credit and there was nothing in the record indicating that most of the purchases charged to the account were for anything other than personal, family, or household purposes.

  10. Ind. Life Ins. and Subsidiary v. U.S., (S.D.Ind. 1996)

    940 F. Supp. 1370 (S.D. Ind. 1996)   Cited 3 times

    No. IP 95-0770-C H/G. September 30, 1996. Matthew J. Zinn, Steptoe Johnson, Washington, DC, Theodore R. Groom, Groom Nordberg, Washington, DC, and Theodore J. Nowacki, Bose McKinney Evans, Indianapolis, IN, for plaintiff. Richard J. Gagnon, Jr., United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, and Jeffrey L. Hunter, Assistant United States Attorney, Indianapolis, IN, for defendant. William B. Harman, Jr., Davis Harman, Washington, DC, and James W. Riley, Jr., Riley, Bennett Egloff, Indianapolis