15 Cited authorities

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
477 U.S. 242 (1986) Cited 236,142 times 38 Legal Analyses
Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett
477 U.S. 317 (1986) Cited 216,254 times 40 Legal Analyses
Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"
Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio
475 U.S. 574 (1986) Cited 113,092 times 38 Legal Analyses
Holding that, on summary judgment, antitrust plaintiffs "must show that the inference of conspiracy is reasonable in light of the competing inferences of independent action or collusive action that could not have harmed" them
Street v. J.C. Bradford Co.
886 F.2d 1472 (6th Cir. 1989) Cited 6,170 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding summary judgment is proper when, "after being afforded sufficient time for discovery, as required by Fed.R.Civ.P.56(f)," the non-moving party does not produce evidence to support an essential element of the claim
Moore v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.
8 F.3d 335 (6th Cir. 1993) Cited 2,006 times
In Moore, the Supreme Court considered “whether a police officer violates the Fourth Amendment by making an arrest based on probable cause but prohibited by state law.
Copantitla v. Fiskardo Estiatorio, Inc.
09 Civ. 1608 (RJH) (S.D.N.Y. May. 31, 2011) Cited 188 times
Holding that reasonable jury could find that single instance of unwanted genital contact is actionable
U.S. v. Replogle
301 F.3d 937 (8th Cir. 2002) Cited 178 times
No. 02-1412. Submitted: June 14, 2002. Filed: August 30, 2002. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied: October 28, 2002. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska, Richard G. Kopf, Chief District Judge. John M. Lefler, Lincoln, NE, for appellant. Nancy A. Svoboda, Asst. U.S. Atty., Omaha, NE, for appellee. Before: RILEY, BEAM, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges. MELLOY, Circuit Judge. Lynn J. Replogle, having entered a conditional guilty plea and having received sentence,
Curtis v. Universal Match Corp.
778 F. Supp. 1421 (E.D. Tenn. 1991) Cited 221 times
Holding "where it is simply shown that there is a better, safer, or different design which would have averted the injury, this does not establish that there has been a departure from the required standard of care"
Kilgore v. Outback Steakhouse of Fla., Inc.
160 F.3d 294 (6th Cir. 1998) Cited 128 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that an employer must "inform its employees of its intent to take a tip credit toward the employer's minimum wage obligation," but the employer is not required to explain the tip credit
Martin v. Tango's Rest., Inc.
969 F.2d 1319 (1st Cir. 1992) Cited 80 times
Holding section 203(m) to “require at the very least notice to employees of the employer's intention to treat tips as satisfying part of the employer's minimum wage obligations”
Rule 56 - Summary Judgment
Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 Cited 328,637 times 158 Legal Analyses
Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
Section 206 - Minimum wage
29 U.S.C. § 206 Cited 8,809 times 98 Legal Analyses
Asking only whether the alleged inequality resulted from “any other factor other than sex”
Section 203 - Definitions
29 U.S.C. § 203 Cited 6,785 times 274 Legal Analyses
Recognizing that "custom or practice" under a collective-bargaining agreement can make changing clothes noncompensable
Section 531.59 - The tip wage credit
29 C.F.R. § 531.59 Cited 108 times 8 Legal Analyses
Numbering added for clarity

Hardesty v. Litton's Market and Restaurant, Inc. et al (TV3)

15 Cited authorities

Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"

Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"

Holding that, on summary judgment, antitrust plaintiffs "must show that the inference of conspiracy is reasonable in light of the competing inferences of independent action or collusive action that could not have harmed" them

Holding summary judgment is proper when, "after being afforded sufficient time for discovery, as required by Fed.R.Civ.P.56(f)," the non-moving party does not produce evidence to support an essential element of the claim

In Moore, the Supreme Court considered “whether a police officer violates the Fourth Amendment by making an arrest based on probable cause but prohibited by state law.

Holding that reasonable jury could find that single instance of unwanted genital contact is actionable

Holding "where it is simply shown that there is a better, safer, or different design which would have averted the injury, this does not establish that there has been a departure from the required standard of care"

Holding that an employer must "inform its employees of its intent to take a tip credit toward the employer's minimum wage obligation," but the employer is not required to explain the tip credit

Holding section 203(m) to “require at the very least notice to employees of the employer's intention to treat tips as satisfying part of the employer's minimum wage obligations”

Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

Asking only whether the alleged inequality resulted from “any other factor other than sex”

Recognizing that "custom or practice" under a collective-bargaining agreement can make changing clothes noncompensable

Numbering added for clarity