6 Cited authorities

  1. Martinez v. Trainor

    556 F.2d 818 (7th Cir. 1977)   Cited 185 times
    Finding that defendant's Rule 59(e) motion "failed to state even one ground for granting the motion and thus failed to meet the minimal standard of 'reasonable specification'"
  2. Cambridge Plating Co., Inc. v. Napco, Inc.

    85 F.3d 752 (1st Cir. 1996)   Cited 105 times
    Holding that limitation of damages provision is not enforceable under Massachusetts law if defendant either willfully repudiated or was willfully dilatory in performing its warranty obligations
  3. Registration Control Systems v. Compusystems

    922 F.2d 805 (Fed. Cir. 1990)   Cited 41 times
    Commenting on Rule 7(b)(B)'s particularity requirement
  4. Riley v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.

    1 F.3d 725 (8th Cir. 1993)   Cited 16 times
    Holding that a skeletal motion that does not satisfy Rule 7(b) does not toll the time to file a notice of appeal because the contrary rule would defeat the purpose of the time limit, "whittle away at the rules and ultimately render them meaningless and unenforceable"
  5. Rule 37 - Failure to Make Disclosures or to Cooperate in Discovery; Sanctions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 37   Cited 45,885 times   319 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a party may be barred from using a witness if it fails to disclose the witness
  6. Rule 7 - Pleadings Allowed; Form of Motions and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 7   Cited 7,516 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Defining "pleadings" for purposes of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure