Finding that defendant's Rule 59(e) motion "failed to state even one ground for granting the motion and thus failed to meet the minimal standard of 'reasonable specification'"
Holding that limitation of damages provision is not enforceable under Massachusetts law if defendant either willfully repudiated or was willfully dilatory in performing its warranty obligations
Holding that a skeletal motion that does not satisfy Rule 7(b) does not toll the time to file a notice of appeal because the contrary rule would defeat the purpose of the time limit, "whittle away at the rules and ultimately render them meaningless and unenforceable"