§Why CasetextPricing

Hammerschlag v. CitiGroup Inc. et al

MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 12 MOTION to Appoint David Garden to serve as lead plaintiff

12 Cited authorities

  1. In re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc.

    960 F.2d 285 (2d Cir. 1992)   Cited 679 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Shutts did not require opt-out rights in a Rule 23(b)(B) class action because the plaintiffs had already submitted to the district court's jurisdiction by filing bankruptcy claims against the defendant

  2. Rockford Memorial Corp. v. United States

    498 U.S. 920 (1990)   Cited 187 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding trial court determination that Fifth Amendment privilege cannot "be used as a shield to avoid disclosure of assets"

  3. Johnson v. Celotex Corp.

    899 F.2d 1281 (2d Cir. 1990)   Cited 552 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "courts have taken the view that considerations of judicial economy favor consolidation"

  4. Huber v. Casablanca Ind., Inc.

    506 U.S. 1088 (1993)   Cited 65 times

    No. 90-1092. January 25, 1993, October TERM, 1992. Dismissal Under Rule 46 C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court's Rule 46. Reported below: 916 F. 2d 85.

  5. Greebel v. FTP Software, Inc.

    939 F. Supp. 57 (D. Mass. 1996)   Cited 72 times
    Holding that only named plaintiffs, rather than all parties moving for appointment as lead plaintiff, need comply with the certification requirement

  6. Garfinkel v. Memory Metals, Inc.

    695 F. Supp. 1397 (D. Conn. 1988)   Cited 30 times

    Civ. No. B-86-488 (WWE). September 19, 1988. Stanley M. Grossman, Marc I. Gross, Shaheen Rushd, Pro Hac Vice, Pomerantz, Levy, Haudek, Block Grossman, New York City, Nicholas A. O'Kelley, Andrew M. Schatz, Julianne Splaine, Schatz Schatz, Ribicoff Kotkin, Hartford, Conn., Elkan Abramowitz, Pro Hac Vice, Obermaier, Morvillo Abramowitz, P.C., New York City, for plaintiffs. Peter L. Truebner, Mark S. Gregory, Taggart D. Adams, Robert A. Horowitz, Kelley, Drye Warren, Stamford, Conn., for Memory Metals

  7. Avagliano v. Sumitomo Shoji America, Inc.

    103 F.R.D. 562 (S.D.N.Y. 1984)   Cited 22 times
    Certifying class of employees in various branch offices pursuant to strong showing on the first and second factors

  8. Section 78j - Manipulative and deceptive devices

    15 U.S.C. § 78j   Cited 12,510 times   165 Legal Analyses
    Granting SEC power to establish rules to further statute forbidding manipulative or deceptive devices in connection with purchase or sale of securities

  9. Rule 42 - Consolidation; Separate Trials

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 42   Cited 9,256 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Granting court's authority to consolidate related cases or "issue any other orders to avoid unnecessary cost or delay."

  10. Section 78u-4 - Private securities litigation

    15 U.S.C. § 78u-4   Cited 7,471 times   48 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts authority to permit discovery if necessary "to preserve evidence or to prevent undue prejudice to" a party

  11. Section 21 - Enforcement provisions

    15 U.S.C. § 21   Cited 244 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Granting the Commission authority to enforce section 7 of the Clayton Act

  12. Section 240.10b-5 - Employment of manipulative and deceptive devices

    17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5   Cited 9,201 times   134 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable any person who "make any untrue statement of material fact"