§Why CasetextPricing

HAMAD v. BUSH et al

Memorandum in opposition to re Petitioner's Emergency Motion to Render Access to Client Meaningful

5 Cited authorities

  1. John Doe Agency v. John Doe Corp.

    493 U.S. 146 (1989)   Cited 542 times
    Holding that records originally assembled for other purposes can come within Exemption 7 if subsequently compiled for law enforcement purposes

  2. Telecommunications Research Action v. F.C.C

    750 F.2d 70 (D.C. Cir. 1984)   Cited 914 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a district court did not have jurisdiction to review a rule or issue a writ of mandamus because of a special review statute that assigned judicial review to the courts of appeals

  3. In re Guantanamo Detainee Cases

    355 F. Supp. 2d 443 (D.D.C. 2005)   Cited 43 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that other Boumediene petitioners were captured in Gambia, Zambia, Bosnia and Thailand

  4. District No. 1, Pacific Coast District, Marine Engineers' Beneficial Ass'n v. Maritime Administration

    215 F.3d 37 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 16 times
    Concluding that where no "governing statute or a regulation ... required the agency to afford interested parties an opportunity to submit comments," it is up to an "agency's discretion" whether to accept or consider such comments

  5. Section 2241 - Power to grant writ

    28 U.S.C. § 2241   Cited 80,205 times   55 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts authority to determine whether detention is "in violation of the . . . laws . . . of the United States"