§Why CasetextPricing

Hall v. Forbes Media LLC

RESPONSE to 10 MOTION to Stay Action

21 Cited authorities

  1. Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins

    578 U.S. 330 (2016)   Cited 7,409 times   437 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a statutory violation, without more, did not give rise to Article III standing

  2. Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife

    504 U.S. 555 (1992)   Cited 27,840 times   138 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"

  3. Summers v. Earth Island Inst.

    555 U.S. 488 (2009)   Cited 3,001 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that supplementation of the district court record to receive affidavits from the organization's members was not permitted "in the circumstances here: after the trial is over, judgment has been entered, and a notice of appeal has been filed"

  4. Clinton v. Jones

    520 U.S. 681 (1997)   Cited 2,694 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding in Section 1983 action no absolute immunity for damages arising from "unofficial conduct"

  5. Landis v. North American Co.

    299 U.S. 248 (1936)   Cited 8,277 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a decision to stay proceedings "calls for the exercise of judgment, which must weigh competing interests and maintain an even balance"

  6. Stanley v. Georgia

    394 U.S. 557 (1969)   Cited 1,249 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the First and Fourteenth Amendment forbid criminalizing the private possession of obscenity

  7. Wysocki v. Int'l. Bus. Machine Corp.

    607 F.3d 1102 (6th Cir. 2010)   Cited 377 times
    Holding that it was proper for the district court to convert a motion to dismiss to a motion for summary judgment where the initial motion noted that it contained materials outside the pleadings and the plaintiff's response "clearly indicated that [plaintiff] understood that the court might grant summary judgment"

  8. Sterk v. Redbox Automated Retail, LLC

    770 F.3d 618 (7th Cir. 2014)   Cited 217 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the movant may prevail on summary judgment by demonstrating "an absence of evidence to support the nonmoving party's case"

  9. Johnson v. Pastoriza

    491 Mich. 417 (Mich. 2012)   Cited 124 times
    Holding that an amendment that created a new right of prevailing plaintiffs to receive damages for loss of consortium and other damages not previously available created a new legal burden on defendants, which could not be applied retroactively

  10. Ohio Environmental Coun. v. U.S. Dist. Court

    565 F.2d 393 (6th Cir. 1977)   Cited 313 times
    Holding that "the District Court has broad discretion to stay proceedings as an incident to its power to control its own docket."

  11. Section 445.1712 - Record or information concerning purchase, lease, rental, or borrowing of books or other written materials, sound recordings, or video recordings; disclosure of customer identification prohibited; exception

    Mich. Comp. Laws § 445.1712   Cited 43 times   1 Legal Analyses

    (1) Subject to subsection (2) and except as provided in section 3 or as otherwise provided by law, a person, or an employee or agent of the person, engaged in the business of selling at retail, renting, or lending books or other written materials, sound recordings, or video recordings shall not knowingly disclose to any person, other than the customer, a record or information that personally identifies the customer as having purchased, leased, rented, or borrowed those materials from the person engaged