§Why CasetextPricing

Hall et al v. The Variable Annuity Life Insurance Company et al

MOTION to Consolidate Cases

4 Cited authorities

  1. Cecala v. Newman

    532 F. Supp. 2d 1118 (D. Ariz. 2007)   Cited 108 times
    Holding that a plaintiff client who enters into a consensual sexual relationship with an attorney without any independently inappropriate conduct on the part of the lawyer, cannot recover in an action unless the plaintiff's legal position was negatively affected by the relationship

  2. Waste Distillation Tech. v. Pan Am. Res.

    775 F. Supp. 759 (D. Del. 1991)   Cited 73 times
    Holding New York plaintiff had legitimate reasons for suing in Delaware, refusing to transfer action to defendant's home state of California

  3. International Paving Systems v. Van Tulco

    806 F. Supp. 17 (E.D.N.Y. 1992)   Cited 12 times

    No. 88 CV 1066. November 10, 1992. Buckley, Treacy, Schaffel, Mackey Abate, New York City by George F. Mackey, for plaintiff. Berger, Steingut, Tarnoff Stern, by Harvey Weinig, Goetz, Fitzpatrick Flynn, New York City by Donald J. Carbone, for defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER HURLEY, District Judge. Plaintiff International Paving Systems, Inc. ("IPS") commenced this action against Van-Tulco, Inc. ("Van-Tulco") and the additional defendants, Van-Tulco's sureties on the payment bond which is the subject

  4. Rule 42 - Consolidation; Separate Trials

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 42   Cited 9,234 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Granting court's authority to consolidate related cases or "issue any other orders to avoid unnecessary cost or delay."