§Why CasetextPricing

Hajjaj v. Rentgrow, Inc.

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM OR, ALTERNATIVELY, TO STRIKE CLASS CLAIMS AND STATUTORY/PUNITIVE DAMAGES CLAIMS

9 Cited authorities

  1. Henson v. CSC Credit Services

    29 F.3d 280 (7th Cir. 1994)   Cited 932 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[i]n order to state a claim under 15 U.S.C § 1681e(b), a consumer must sufficiently allege that a credit reporting agency prepared a report containing 'inaccurate' information"

  2. Grigoryan v. Experian Info. Solutions, Inc.

    84 F. Supp. 3d 1044 (C.D. Cal. 2014)   Cited 38 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a reasonable jury could find defendant's reinvestigation to be unreasonable under § 1681i where defendant failed to attach relevant documents to an ACDV

  3. Safeco Ins. Co. of America v. Burr

    551 U.S. 47 (2007)   10 Legal Analyses

    ON WRITS OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 06-84, 06-100. Argued January 16, 2007. Decided June 4, 2007. Together with No. 06-100, GEICO General Insurance Co. et al. v. Edo, also on certiorari to the same court. The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) requires notice to a consumer subjected to "adverse action . . . based in whole or in part on any information contained in a consumer [credit] report." 15 U.S.C. § 1681m(a). As applied to insurance companies

  4. Richardson v. Fleet Bank of Massachusetts

    190 F. Supp. 2d 81 (D. Mass. 2001)   Cited 18 times
    Finding that at least three prior notices of errors were sufficient to create a factual issue on the reasonableness of the agency's procedures

  5. Bearbones, Inc. v. Peerless Indem. Ins. Co.

    Civil Action No. 3:15-30017-KAR (D. Mass. Oct. 11, 2016)   Cited 2 times

    Civil Action No. 3:15-30017-KAR 10-11-2016 BEARBONES, INC., d/b/a MORNINGSIDE BAKERY, and AMARAL ENTERPRISES LLC, Plaintiffs, v. PEERLESS INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. ROBERTSON, U.S.M.J. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT (Dkt. No. 40) I. I NTRODUCTION Before the court is the motion of the plaintiffs, Bearbones, Inc., d/b/a Morningside Bakery ("Morningside"), and Amaral Enterprises LLC ("Amaral"), to file a supplemental complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P

  6. Section 1681n - Civil liability for willful noncompliance

    15 U.S.C. § 1681n   Cited 2,307 times   42 Legal Analyses
    In §§1681n and 1681o, the Act authorizes consumer suits for money damages against "[a]ny person" who willfully or negligently fails to comply with this directive.

  7. Section 1681e - Compliance procedures

    15 U.S.C. § 1681e   Cited 1,344 times   61 Legal Analyses
    Requiring "[e]very consumer reporting agency" to "maintain reasonable procedures . . . to limit the furnishing of consumer reports" to permissible purposes

  8. Section 1786.50 - Liability for failure to comply with requirements of title

    Cal. Civ. Code § 1786.50   Cited 19 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Limiting recovery to "[a]ny actual damages sustained by the consumer as a result of the failure or, except in the case of class actions, ten thousand dollars, whichever sum is greater"

  9. Section 1786.20 - Procedures to avoid violations of section 1786.18 and to limit furnishing reports for purposes listed in section 1786.12

    Cal. Civ. Code § 1786.20   Cited 8 times

    (a) An investigative consumer reporting agency shall maintain reasonable procedures designed to avoid violations of Section 1786.18 and to limit furnishing of investigative consumer reports for the purposes listed under Section 1786.12. These procedures shall require that prospective users of the information identify themselves, certify the purposes for which the information is sought and that the information will be used for no other purposes, and make the certifications described in paragraph (4)