§Why CasetextPricing

Gulf Restoration Network et al v. Jackson et al

REPLY to Response to Motion

16 Cited authorities

  1. Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency

    549 U.S. 497 (2007)   Cited 1,164 times   97 Legal Analyses
    Holding that denials of petitions for rulemaking are judicially reviewable

  2. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.

    556 U.S. 502 (2009)   Cited 1,054 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that agencies may not change their policies "sub silentio "

  3. Franklin v. Massachusetts

    505 U.S. 788 (1992)   Cited 754 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the decennial census report was not subject to judicial review, because it carried "no direct consequences for the reapportionment," and the President was "not expressly required to adhere to the policy decisions reflected in the Secretary's report"

  4. Lincoln v. Vigil

    508 U.S. 182 (1993)   Cited 415 times
    Holding that an agency decision to discontinue a program was authorized by law because the action “f[ell] within the [Indian Health] Service's statutory mandate to provide health care to Indian people”

  5. Village v. Retsinas

    190 F.3d 310 (5th Cir. 1999)   Cited 147 times
    In Christopher Village v. Retsinas, plaintiffs, managers of a subsidized low-income housing complex, sued Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) officers, claiming that HUD unlawfully refused to entertain plaintiffs' request to raise the rent on residents in order to cover necessary repairs.

  6. WWHT, Inc. v. FCC

    656 F.2d 807 (D.C. Cir. 1981)   Cited 112 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an agency's denial of a rulemaking petition is subject to judicial review" unless "there is evidence of a clear and convincing legislative intent to negate review"

  7. Defenders v. Gutierrez

    532 F.3d 913 (D.C. Cir. 2008)   Cited 47 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding standing established when "order from the district court could redress appellants’ injury, at least in part"

  8. Handley v. Chapman

    587 F.3d 273 (5th Cir. 2009)   Cited 37 times
    Holding that the regulation was neither arbitrary nor capricious because BOP articulated "public safety" as a rationale for its policy

  9. Conservancy of Southwest Florida v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv.

    677 F.3d 1073 (11th Cir. 2012)   Cited 15 times
    Holding that the language in a statutory provision that stated that “[c]ritical habitat may be established for those species now listed as threatened or endangered” was unreviewable

  10. Nat'l Parks Conservation Ass'n v. United States Dep't of Interior

    794 F. Supp. 2d 39 (D.D.C. 2011)   Cited 8 times
    Holding that denial of petition for rulemaking, issued after lawsuit was filed, mooted claim that agency had failed to respond to the petition

  11. Section 701 - Application; definitions

    5 U.S.C. § 701   Cited 9,406 times   36 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the definition given in Section 551

  12. Section 1313 - Water quality standards and implementation plans

    33 U.S.C. § 1313   Cited 550 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Requiring a State to submit new or revised water regulations for EPA's review