10 Cited authorities

Mullane v. Central Hanover Tr. Co.
339 U.S. 306 (1950) Cited 10,422 times 19 Legal Analyses
Holding that due process requires a hearing "appropriate to the nature of the case"
Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Schlunk
486 U.S. 694 (1988) Cited 880 times 10 Legal Analyses
Holding that a state law permitting a foreign corporation to be served domestically through its U.S. subsidiary did not implicate the Hague Service Convention
Robinson v. Hanrahan
409 U.S. 38 (1972) Cited 247 times
Holding notice of forfeiture proceeding was inadequate where government officials knew vehicle owner was jailed and mailed notice was unlikely to reach him
Dobkin v. Chapman
21 N.Y.2d 490 (N.Y. 1968) Cited 198 times
Holding that service under those circumstances comports with due process
Gidatex, S.r.L. v. Campaniello Imports, Ltd.
82 F. Supp. 2d 126 (S.D.N.Y. 1999) Cited 46 times
Holding that party invoking equitable principles of unclean hands, laches, and acquiescence has burden of proof
International Controls Corp. v. Vesco
593 F.2d 166 (2d Cir. 1979) Cited 70 times
Affirming district court's authorization of service of process by ordinary mail to last known address
Apollo Theater Foundation, Inc v. Western Int'l Syndication
No. 02 Civ. 10037 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. May. 5, 2005) Cited 15 times
Denying motion for leave to amend, where plaintiff argued it discovered the factual basis for proposed new claim during deposition, because it was unnecessary for Apollo to wait until after the deposition . . . to raise a claim based on information within its control even before the initiation of this action"
United States v. Braunig
553 F.2d 777 (2d Cir. 1977) Cited 46 times
No. 703, Docket 76-1448. Argued January 24, 1977. Decided April 11, 1977. Certiorari Denied June 6, 1977. Donald E. Nawi, New York City (Howard L. Jacobs, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellant. Eugene Neal Kaplan, Asst. U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., New York City (Robert B. Fiske, Jr., U.S. Atty., Jed S. Rakoff and Frederick T. Davis, Asst. U.S. Attys., S.D.N.Y., New York City, on the brief), for appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
Rule 4 - Summons
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 Cited 71,368 times 127 Legal Analyses
Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time
Section 308 - Personal service upon a natural person
N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 308 Cited 5,266 times
Providing for "nail and mail" service and for service "in such manner as the court, upon motion without notice, directs, if service is impracticable under paragraphs one, two and four of this section"

Gudavadze et al v. Joseph Kay et al

10 Cited authorities

Holding that due process requires a hearing "appropriate to the nature of the case"

Holding that a state law permitting a foreign corporation to be served domestically through its U.S. subsidiary did not implicate the Hague Service Convention

Holding notice of forfeiture proceeding was inadequate where government officials knew vehicle owner was jailed and mailed notice was unlikely to reach him

Holding that service under those circumstances comports with due process

Holding that party invoking equitable principles of unclean hands, laches, and acquiescence has burden of proof

Affirming district court's authorization of service of process by ordinary mail to last known address

Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time

Providing for "nail and mail" service and for service "in such manner as the court, upon motion without notice, directs, if service is impracticable under paragraphs one, two and four of this section"