§Why CasetextPricing

Guarisma v. Microsoft Corporation

RESPONSE in Opposition re Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 1 Complaint, or, Alternatively, to Compel Arbitration on an Individual Basis

73 Cited authorities

  1. Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins

    578 U.S. 330 (2016)   Cited 7,404 times   437 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a statutory violation, without more, did not give rise to Article III standing

  2. Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife

    504 U.S. 555 (1992)   Cited 27,832 times   138 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"

  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Envtl. Servs. (TOC), Inc.

    528 U.S. 167 (2000)   Cited 7,152 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs who curtailed their recreational activities on a river due to reasonable concerns about the effect of pollutant discharges into that river had standing

  4. Clapper v. Amnesty Int'l USA

    568 U.S. 398 (2013)   Cited 3,054 times   169 Legal Analyses
    Holding that respondents could not establish injury by relying on a "speculative chain of possibilities"

  5. First Options of Chi., Inc. v. Kaplan

    514 U.S. 938 (1995)   Cited 5,350 times   47 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a circuit court reviewing a district court's disposition of an arbitration award should apply "ordinary, not special, standards."

  6. Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez

    577 U.S. 153 (2016)   Cited 1,213 times   105 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an unaccepted settlement offer or offer of judgment does not moot a plaintiff's case" but noting that the Supreme Court had previously "simply assumed, without deciding, that an offer of complete relief pursuant to Rule 68, even if unaccepted, moots a plaintiff's claim" when a plaintiff did not challenge the lower court's finding on that point

  7. Granite Rock Co. v. Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters

    561 U.S. 287 (2010)   Cited 1,342 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the court decides when union ratified, and thus became a party to, collective bargaining agreement containing arbitration clause

  8. Volt Info. Scis., Inc. v. Bd. of Trs.

    489 U.S. 468 (1989)   Cited 3,204 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Federal Arbitration Act requires courts to enforce arbitration agreements according to their terms, including where the parties "specify by contract the rules under which arbitration will be conducted"

  9. Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency

    549 U.S. 497 (2007)   Cited 1,158 times   97 Legal Analyses
    Holding that denials of petitions for rulemaking are judicially reviewable

  10. Linda R. S. v. Richard D

    410 U.S. 614 (1973)   Cited 3,558 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a mother lacked standing to seek an injunction to force the prosecution of her child’s father for failing to pay child support, reasoning that because prosecution would result only in the father being jailed, it was overly "speculative" whether an injunction would result in future child support payments

  11. Section 2301 - Definitions

    15 U.S.C. § 2301   Cited 2,519 times   36 Legal Analyses
    Including as consumers those entitled to enforce a warranty "under applicable State law"

  12. Section 1681e - Compliance procedures

    15 U.S.C. § 1681e   Cited 1,346 times   61 Legal Analyses
    Requiring "[e]very consumer reporting agency" to "maintain reasonable procedures . . . to limit the furnishing of consumer reports" to permissible purposes