Goldberg v. Kelly

Holding that due process rights attach to the deprivation of Government benefits

Hill v. Colorado

Holding content neutral a ban on "picketing," "demonstrating," "protest, education, or counseling" even though it may require the government "to review the content of the statements made"

Weinberger v. Salfi

Holding existence of a final decision made after a hearing is central to the grant of subject matter jurisdiction under § 405(g)

In re Ruffalo

Holding that a lawyer involved in disbarment proceedings is, like a criminal defendant, entitled to "fair notice of the charge," but never explaining how such notice can be provided

Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners

Holding that a state cannot exclude a person from the practice of law based on failure to satisfy its standards of qualification "when there is no basis for their finding that he fails to meet these standards"

State v. Reyna

Aggravating factor of age is an element of the crime if the State seeks to convict the defendant of the more serious offense for purposes of sentencing

State v. Nunn

Holding that an oral amendment is effective even without later memorialization, so long as the defendant is not prejudiced

State v. Thompson

Holding that had legislature intended to make possession of each substance listed in K.SA. 65–7006 a separate offense, it could have explicitly stated as much in the statute

State v. Clements

In Clements, the defendant was charged with aggravated criminal sodomy under K.S.A. 1986 Supp. 21-3506, a class B felony.

State v. Hurley

Section 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

Holding liable any state actor who "subjects, or causes [a person] to be subjected" to a constitutional violation

Section 1331 - Federal question

Finding that in order to invoke federal question jurisdiction, a plaintiff's claims must arise "under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States."

Section 1367 - Supplemental jurisdiction

Holding that in civil actions proceeding in federal court based solely on diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, the district court "shall not have supplemental jurisdiction" over "claims by plaintiffs against persons made parties under Rule . . . 24" or "over claims by persons . . seeking to intervene as plaintiffs under Rule 24," if "exercising supplemental jurisdiction over such claims would be inconsistent with the jurisdictional requirements of section 1332"

Section 2201 - Creation of remedy

Granting district courts the authority to create a remedy with the force of a final judgment