30 Cited authorities

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
477 U.S. 242 (1986) Cited 236,959 times 38 Legal Analyses
Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett
477 U.S. 317 (1986) Cited 216,952 times 40 Legal Analyses
Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"
Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio
475 U.S. 574 (1986) Cited 113,451 times 38 Legal Analyses
Holding that, on summary judgment, antitrust plaintiffs "must show that the inference of conspiracy is reasonable in light of the competing inferences of independent action or collusive action that could not have harmed" them
Scott v. Harris
550 U.S. 372 (2007) Cited 11,848 times 11 Legal Analyses
Holding that it is at least sometimes reasonable for an officer to intentionally collide with a suspect's vehicle during a pursuit
Adickes v. Kress Co.
398 U.S. 144 (1970) Cited 25,102 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a private person who conspires with government actors to deprive a plaintiff of her constitutional rights acts "under color of law" for purposes of § 1983
Arpin v. Santa Clara Valley Transp. Agency
261 F.3d 912 (9th Cir. 2001) Cited 1,790 times
Holding that "conclusory allegations unsupported by factual data are insufficient to defeat summary judgment motion"
Addisu v. Fred Meyer, Inc.
198 F.3d 1130 (9th Cir. 2000) Cited 1,459 times
Holding that § 1985 "prohibits two or more persons from conspiring to deprive any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the law"
Ellison v. Robertson
357 F.3d 1072 (9th Cir. 2004) Cited 659 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that "the district court erred in concluding on summary judgment that [the ISP] satisfied the requirements of § 512" because the record showed that the ISP "allowed notices of potential copyright infringement to fall into a vacuum and to go unheeded," indicating it "had not reasonably implemented its policy against repeat infringers"
Fortyune v. American Multi-Cinema, Inc.
364 F.3d 1075 (9th Cir. 2004) Cited 572 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding defendant movie theater must ensure that wheelchair accessible seats and companion seats, which are required under § 221 of the 2010 Standards, are actually available for wheelchair customers and their companions
Barnes v. AT&T Pension Benefit Plan
718 F. Supp. 2d 1167 (N.D. Cal. 2010) Cited 401 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that Rule 12(f) motions are disfavored due to the strong policy favoring resolution on the merits
Rule 56 - Summary Judgment
Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 Cited 329,812 times 158 Legal Analyses
Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading
Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 Cited 157,353 times 196 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
Section 501 - Infringement of copyright
17 U.S.C. § 501 Cited 3,185 times 28 Legal Analyses
Granting a cause of action to "[t]he legal or beneficial owner of an exclusive right under a copyright"
Section 512 - Limitations on liability relating to material online
17 U.S.C. § 512 Cited 575 times 186 Legal Analyses
Denying the safe harbor if the service provider receives "a financial benefit directly attributable to the infringing activity"

Greg Young Publishing, Inc. v. Zazzle, Inc.

30 Cited authorities

Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"

Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"

Holding that, on summary judgment, antitrust plaintiffs "must show that the inference of conspiracy is reasonable in light of the competing inferences of independent action or collusive action that could not have harmed" them

Holding that it is at least sometimes reasonable for an officer to intentionally collide with a suspect's vehicle during a pursuit

Holding that a private person who conspires with government actors to deprive a plaintiff of her constitutional rights acts "under color of law" for purposes of § 1983

Holding that "conclusory allegations unsupported by factual data are insufficient to defeat summary judgment motion"

Holding that § 1985 "prohibits two or more persons from conspiring to deprive any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the law"

Holding defendant movie theater must ensure that wheelchair accessible seats and companion seats, which are required under § 221 of the 2010 Standards, are actually available for wheelchair customers and their companions

Holding that Rule 12(f) motions are disfavored due to the strong policy favoring resolution on the merits

Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."

Granting a cause of action to "[t]he legal or beneficial owner of an exclusive right under a copyright"

Denying the safe harbor if the service provider receives "a financial benefit directly attributable to the infringing activity"