§Why CasetextPricing

Great Harvest Franchising, Inc. et al v. Panera Bread Company, Inc.

REPLY to Response to Motion re MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: 1 Complaint

3 Cited authorities

  1. Young v. City of Mount Ranier

    238 F.3d 567 (4th Cir. 2001)   Cited 2,297 times
    Holding that "[p]retrial detainees are entitled to at least the same protection under the Fourteenth Amendment as are convicted prisoners under the Eighth Amendment"

  2. State Farm Fire Casualty Company v. Kudasz

    3:10-cv-545-RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C. May. 12, 2011)   Cited 3 times

    3:10-cv-545-RJC-DCK. May 12, 2011 ORDER ROBERT CONRAD JR., District Judge THIS MATTER is before the court on the defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 6) and the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation recommending denying the motion (Doc. No. 9). Subsequently, Plaintiff timely amended its complaint (Doc. No. 11). It is well-settled that a timely filed amended pleading supersedes the original pleading, and that motions directed at superseded pleadings are to be denied as moot. See Young

  3. Section 1114 - Remedies; infringement; innocent infringement by printers and publishers

    15 U.S.C. § 1114   Cited 7,901 times   88 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable "Any person who shall, without the consent of the registrant — use in commerce any reproduction . . . of a registered mark . . . in connection with which such use is likely to cause confusion."