§Why CasetextPricing

Graham Enginerring Corp. v. Schilke

REPLY BRIEF re MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

11 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 252,544 times   279 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable

  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 266,461 times   365 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "

  3. Fowler v. UPMC Shadyside

    578 F.3d 203 (3d Cir. 2009)   Cited 14,075 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion "in denying a motion for a class action determination which was untimely under the local rule"

  4. Advanced Fluid Sys., Inc. v. Huber

    28 F. Supp. 3d 306 (M.D. Pa. 2014)   Cited 46 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding that cognizable CFAA loss may include lost revenue incurred because of an interruption of service but does not include claims for lost business opportunities, damaged reputation, and other missed revenue opportunities

  5. Sheinman Provisions, Inc. v. National Deli, LLC

    CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-cv-453 (E.D. Pa. Jul. 15, 2008)   Cited 33 times
    Granting motion to dismiss unjust enrichment claim because "the agreement at issue is a fully integrated contract and, by its terms, it governs the entire relationship of the parties"

  6. Cunningham Lindsey U.S., Inc. v. Bonnani

    CIVIL NO. 1:13-CV-2528 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 22, 2014)   Cited 10 times
    Dismissing breach of fiduciary duty claim "governed entirely by the [defendants'] employment agreements and their respective non-solicitation and non-competition provisions" where plaintiff "failed to allege any conduct underlying its fiduciary duty . . . claim that is not contemplated by the defendants' contracts"

  7. Adderly v. Co.

    646 F. App'x 138 (3d Cir. 2016)   Cited 7 times

    No. 15-3197 04-05-2016 NATHANIEL L. ADDERLY, Appellant v. CO STOFKO; LT. DOMAGAUER; CO WHITE; CO KONDRASKI; CO KOTZ; LT. WILDE; CO LYNCH; LARSON, Deputy Warden; WARDEN PIAZZA; LT. AMEEN; CAPT. ORSWICK; CO WICHT; CO BLEICH; RON, Supervising Therapist Ron "Doe"; KAWALSKI, Hearing Examiner PER CURIAM ALD-202 NOT PRECEDENTIAL On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 3-12-cv-01546) District Judge: Honorable Edwin M. Kosik Submitted

  8. Sunlight Elec. Contracting Co. v. Turchi

    CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-5834 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 13, 2011)   Cited 5 times
    Finding that "[t]hough [plaintiff] proclaims that its veil-piercing claims succeed in stating a claim, it fails to direct the Court . . . to any specific factual allegations in its compliant that support the[] claims . . . . inspection of the complaint reveals that [plaintiff] has substantiated its veil-piercing claims purely with conclusory statements."

  9. U.S. Bank National Association v. Parker

    Case No. 4:09CV1755 HEA (E.D. Mo. Jul. 9, 2010)   Cited 4 times
    Holding that information and belief alone is too speculative to give defendant sufficient notice of the basis for the claim

  10. Com. v. Gorman

    600 Pa. 743 (Pa. 2009)   Cited 2 times

    No. 554 EAL 2008. February 5, 2009. Appeal from the Superior Court Pa.Super., 963 A.2d 565. Dispositions of Petitions For Allowance of Appeals Denied.