§Why CasetextPricing

Grace et al v. District of Columbia et al

MOTION to Stay re Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Order on Motion for Permanent Injunction,,,,,, 45 Memorandum & Opinion and Motion for Immediate Administrative Stay

49 Cited authorities

  1. Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc.

    555 U.S. 7 (2008)   Cited 17,299 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a plaintiff must establish "that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm"

  2. Nken v. Holder

    556 U.S. 418 (2009)   Cited 3,465 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "courts must be mindful that the Government's role as the respondent in every removal proceeding does not make the public interest in each individual one negligible"

  3. University of Texas v. Camenisch

    451 U.S. 390 (1981)   Cited 3,162 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the question whether a preliminary injunction should have been issued . . . is moot . . . [where] the terms of the injunction . . . have been fully and irrevocably carried out."

  4. Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project

    561 U.S. 1 (2010)   Cited 885 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that there was a credible risk of enforcement because about 150 people had been previously charged with violating the relevant statue- several for violating the statutory terms at issue in that case

  5. Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo

    456 U.S. 305 (1982)   Cited 1,797 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Federal Water Pollution Control Act did not mandate injunctions against its violation

  6. Salazar v. Buono

    559 U.S. 700 (2010)   Cited 226 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Reversing Buono v. Kempthorne , 527 F.3d 758 (9th Cir. 2008), and Buono v. Kempthorne , 502 F.3d 1069 (9th Cir. 2007)

  7. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

    520 U.S. 180 (1997)   Cited 329 times
    Holding that "Congress has drawn reasonable inferences based on substantial evidence," when it had before it evidence including some memory surveys

  8. Maryland v. King

    567 U.S. 1301 (2012)   Cited 204 times
    Finding irreparable harm while acknowledging respondent's argument that petitioner's "eight-week delay in applying for a stay undermine[d] its allegation of irreparable harm" was a "sound point[]"

  9. Yakus v. United States

    321 U.S. 414 (1944)   Cited 1,523 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 did not unconstitutionally delegate the legislative power of Congress

  10. Ezell v. City of Chicago

    651 F.3d 684 (7th Cir. 2011)   Cited 542 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a supplier of firing-range facilities had standing to challenge a Chicago ordinance that burdened its potential customers' firearms training

  11. Rule 7 - Pleadings Allowed; Form of Motions and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 7   Cited 7,742 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Defining "pleadings" for purposes of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

  12. Rule 62 - Stay of Proceedings to Enforce a Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 62   Cited 4,207 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Granting of stay is discretionary

  13. Section 22-4506 - Issue of a license to carry a pistol

    D.C. Code § 22-4506   Cited 10 times
    Authorizing issuance of concealed-carry licenses