38 Cited authorities

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

    509 U.S. 579 (1993)   Cited 21,107 times   195 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Fed. R. Evid. 702 authorizes a "preliminary assessment of whether the reasoning or methodology underlying the testimony [of an expert] is scientifically valid and of whether that reasoning or methodology properly can be applied to the facts in issue"
  2. McDonald v. City of Chicago

    561 U.S. 742 (2010)   Cited 1,332 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “the Second Amendment right is fully applicable to the States”
  3. Baze v. Rees

    553 U.S. 35 (2008)   Cited 941 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Kentucky's failure to adopt the proposed alternatives does not, by itself, demonstrate that the execution procedure is cruel and unusual
  4. University of Texas v. Camenisch

    451 U.S. 390 (1981)   Cited 2,455 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the question whether a preliminary injunction should have been issued . . . is moot . . . [where] the terms of the injunction . . . have been fully and irrevocably carried out."
  5. Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project

    561 U.S. 1 (2010)   Cited 656 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs cannot prevail in a vagueness challenge by "pointing to hypothetical situations designed to test the limits" of certain statutory terms, when their own case presented no such problem
  6. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

    512 U.S. 622 (1994)   Cited 1,108 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that rules that distinguish "based only upon the manner in which speakers transmit their messages to viewers, and not upon the messages they carry" are content-neutral
  7. Federal Communications Commission v. National Citizens Committee for Broadcasting

    436 U.S. 775 (1978)   Cited 253 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the cross-ownership rules do not "condition receipt of a broadcast license upon forfeiture of the right to publish a newspaper" because even "[u]nder the regulations, . . . a newspaper owner need not forfeit anything in order to acquire a license for a station located in another community"
  8. Moore v. Madigan

    702 F.3d 933 (7th Cir. 2012)   Cited 221 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding Illinois licensing scheme for open carry unconstitutional
  9. Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley

    819 F.2d 294 (D.C. Cir. 1987)   Cited 410 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding independent utility in four-mile section of mass transit project originally planned as 18.6 miles
  10. Heller v. District of Columbia

    670 F.3d 1244 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 177 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the government had not borne its burden under intermediate scrutiny because “the District needs to present some meaningful evidence, not mere assertions, to justify its predictive judgments”
  11. Rule 201 - Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts

    Fed. R. Evid. 201   Cited 21,941 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding "[n]ormally, in deciding a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, courts must limit their inquiry to the facts stated in the complaint and the documents either attached to or incorporated in the complaint. However, courts may also consider matters of which they may take judicial notice."
  12. Rule 702 - Testimony by Expert Witnesses

    Fed. R. Evid. 702   Cited 21,373 times   183 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that "scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge" may assist the trier of fact