§Why CasetextPricing

Grace et al v. District of Columbia et al

Memorandum in opposition to re MOTION To Consolidate the Preliminary Injunction Proceedings with the Determination on the Merits

37 Cited authorities

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

    509 U.S. 579 (1993)   Cited 26,235 times   224 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a trial judge must ensure that all admitted expert testimony "is not only relevant, but reliable"

  2. McDonald v. City of Chicago

    561 U.S. 742 (2010)   Cited 2,253 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Second Amendment applies to the states, through incorporation under the Fourteenth Amendment

  3. University of Texas v. Camenisch

    451 U.S. 390 (1981)   Cited 3,076 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the question whether a preliminary injunction should have been issued . . . is moot . . . [where] the terms of the injunction . . . have been fully and irrevocably carried out."

  4. Baze v. Rees

    553 U.S. 35 (2008)   Cited 1,035 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding in the Eighth Amendment context that the government's choice of drug can violate the Constitution

  5. Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project

    561 U.S. 1 (2010)   Cited 854 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the plaintiffs had standing because a statute criminalized knowingly providing material support or resources to a foreign terrorist organization, and the plaintiffs had provided support to groups designated as terrorist organizations and planned to provide similar support in the future

  6. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

    512 U.S. 622 (1994)   Cited 1,290 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that rules that distinguish "based only upon the manner in which speakers transmit their messages to viewers, and not upon the messages they carry" are content-neutral

  7. Federal Communications Commission v. National Citizens Committee for Broadcasting

    436 U.S. 775 (1978)   Cited 259 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the cross-ownership rules do not "condition receipt of a broadcast license upon forfeiture of the right to publish a newspaper" because even "[u]nder the regulations, . . . a newspaper owner need not forfeit anything in order to acquire a license for a station located in another community"

  8. Moore v. Madigan

    702 F.3d 933 (7th Cir. 2012)   Cited 243 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding Illinois licensing scheme for open carry unconstitutional

  9. Heller v. District of Columbia

    670 F.3d 1244 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 245 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that D.C.'s ban on large-capacity magazines was akin to a regulation of the manner in which speech takes place

  10. Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley

    819 F.2d 294 (D.C. Cir. 1987)   Cited 419 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding independent utility in four-mile section of mass transit project originally planned as 18.6 miles

  11. Rule 201 - Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts

    Fed. R. Evid. 201   Cited 28,189 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Holding "[n]ormally, in deciding a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, courts must limit their inquiry to the facts stated in the complaint and the documents either attached to or incorporated in the complaint. However, courts may also consider matters of which they may take judicial notice."

  12. Rule 702 - Testimony by Expert Witnesses

    Fed. R. Evid. 702   Cited 26,595 times   252 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the Daubert standard