Holding that the common-law and First Amendment presumptions of open records apply in civil cases; setting forth the standard under which such presumptions may be overcome
Holding that "the mere filing of a paper or document with the court is insufficient to render that paper a judicial document subject to the right of public access;" rather, "the item filed must be relevant to the performance of the judicial function and useful in the judicial process"
Holding that under the history-and-logic test, Title III materials that had not been used in the context of a motion or trial did not fall within the right of access