6 Cited authorities

  1. Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga

    435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006)   Cited 769 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that common law and First Amendment right of access can be overcome only if specific, on the record, findings are made demonstrating that closure is essential to preserving higher values and is narrowly tailored to serve that interest
  2. U.S. v. Amodeo

    71 F.3d 1044 (2d Cir. 1995)   Cited 792 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that district court abused its discretion by unsealing record
  3. U.S. v. Amodeo

    44 F.3d 141 (2d Cir. 1995)   Cited 354 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding it proper for district court to edit and redact judicial document to allow access to appropriate portions after weighing competing interests
  4. In re New York Times Co.

    577 F.3d 401 (2d Cir. 2009)   Cited 40 times
    Holding that under the history-and-logic test, Title III materials that had not been used in the context of a motion or trial did not fall within the right of access
  5. Standard Inv. v. Financial Indus

    347 F. App'x 615 (2d Cir. 2009)   Cited 8 times
    Upholding district court's finding that the defendant's "interest in protecting confidential business information outweighs the qualified First Amendment presumption of public access"
  6. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 71,273 times   538 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37