§Why CasetextPricing

Gorfinkel v. Vayntrub et al

RESPONSE in Opposition re MOTION for Leave to File Memorandum in Opposition to Subject Matter Jurisdiction in the instant matter pursuant to the Order to Show Cause dated March 24, 2014 Declaration

3 Cited authorities

  1. Ruhrgas AG v. Marathon Oil Co.

    526 U.S. 574 (1999)   Cited 4,159 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, because "[t]hey keep the federal courts within the bounds the Constitution and Congress have prescribed," questions concerning subject matter jurisdiction "must be policed by the courts on their own initiative even at the highest level"

  2. Section 1447 - Procedure after removal generally

    28 U.S.C. § 1447   Cited 33,113 times   110 Legal Analyses
    Holding that with exceptions not relevant here, "[a]n order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise"

  3. Section 1631 - Transfer to cure want of jurisdiction

    28 U.S.C. § 1631   Cited 7,656 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts authority to transfer action to court with proper jurisdiction