40 Cited authorities

Celotex Corp. v. Catrett
477 U.S. 317 (1986) Cited 216,278 times 40 Legal Analyses
Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"
Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio
475 U.S. 574 (1986) Cited 113,103 times 38 Legal Analyses
Holding that, on summary judgment, antitrust plaintiffs "must show that the inference of conspiracy is reasonable in light of the competing inferences of independent action or collusive action that could not have harmed" them
Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife
504 U.S. 555 (1992) Cited 27,829 times 138 Legal Analyses
Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"
Comcast Corp. v. Behrend
569 U.S. 27 (2013) Cited 2,230 times 232 Legal Analyses
Holding that at the class certification stage, "any model supporting a plaintiff's damages case must be consistent with its liability case"
Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.
429 U.S. 477 (1977) Cited 2,063 times 20 Legal Analyses
Holding that mere economic loss does not amount to an antitrust injury under the antitrust laws
Kwikset Corp. v. Superior Court
51 Cal.4th 310 (Cal. 2011) Cited 1,563 times 27 Legal Analyses
Holding "the standards for establishing standing under section 17204 and eligibility for restitution under section 17203 are wholly distinct"
Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown Williamson Tobacco Corp.
509 U.S. 209 (1993) Cited 729 times 19 Legal Analyses
Holding that "tacit collusion" of participants in oligopolistic market to raise prices in response to higher costs is "not in itself unlawful"
Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.
20 Cal.4th 163 (Cal. 1999) Cited 2,421 times 22 Legal Analyses
Holding that for an act to be "unfair," it must "threaten" a violation of law or "violate the policy or spirit of one of those laws because its effects are comparable to or the same as a violation of the law"
Pac. Bell Tel. Co. v. Linkline Commc'ns, Inc.
555 U.S. 438 (2009) Cited 401 times 10 Legal Analyses
Holding "price-squeezing" claims not cognizable under the Sherman Act
In re Tobacco II Cases
46 Cal.4th 298 (Cal. 2009) Cited 1,203 times 35 Legal Analyses
Holding class representatives had standing to challenge common marketing of cigarettes despite differences in the advertisements or statements on which class members relied
Rule 56 - Summary Judgment
Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 Cited 328,681 times 158 Legal Analyses
Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
Rule 54 - Judgment; Costs
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54 Cited 41,187 times 141 Legal Analyses
Holding party seeking fees may additionally seek "nontaxable expenses"
Section 6301 - Definitions
15 U.S.C. § 6301 Cited 25 times
Defining "manager" as "a person who receives compensation for service as an agent or representative of a boxer"
Section 6309 - Enforcement
15 U.S.C. § 6309 Cited 16 times
(a) Injunctions Whenever the Attorney General of the United States has reasonable cause to believe that a person is engaged in a violation of this chapter, the Attorney General may bring a civil action in the appropriate district court of the United States requesting such relief, including a permanent or temporary injunction, restraining order, or other order, against the person, as the Attorney General determines to be necessary to restrain the person from continuing to engage in, sanction, promote
Section 6308 - Conflicts of interest
15 U.S.C. § 6308 Cited 9 times
Prohibiting promoters in certain circumstances from having financial interests in management of boxers

Golden Boy Promotions Llc et al v. Alan Haymon et al

40 Cited authorities

Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"

Holding that, on summary judgment, antitrust plaintiffs "must show that the inference of conspiracy is reasonable in light of the competing inferences of independent action or collusive action that could not have harmed" them

Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"

Holding that at the class certification stage, "any model supporting a plaintiff's damages case must be consistent with its liability case"

Holding that mere economic loss does not amount to an antitrust injury under the antitrust laws

Holding "the standards for establishing standing under section 17204 and eligibility for restitution under section 17203 are wholly distinct"

Holding that "tacit collusion" of participants in oligopolistic market to raise prices in response to higher costs is "not in itself unlawful"

Holding that for an act to be "unfair," it must "threaten" a violation of law or "violate the policy or spirit of one of those laws because its effects are comparable to or the same as a violation of the law"

Holding "price-squeezing" claims not cognizable under the Sherman Act

Holding class representatives had standing to challenge common marketing of cigarettes despite differences in the advertisements or statements on which class members relied

Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

Holding party seeking fees may additionally seek "nontaxable expenses"

Defining "manager" as "a person who receives compensation for service as an agent or representative of a boxer"

Prohibiting promoters in certain circumstances from having financial interests in management of boxers