62 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 267,813 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 280,791 times   369 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
  3. Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz

    471 U.S. 462 (1985)   Cited 17,367 times   47 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a defendant has "fair warning" if he purposefully directs his activities at residents of the forum and if the litigation results from alleged injuries arising out of or relating to those activities.
  4. Daimlerchrysler Corp. v. Cuno

    547 U.S. 332 (2006)   Cited 2,911 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs did not have standing because their injury was " 'conjectural or hypothetical' in that it depend[ed] on how legislators respond[ed] to a reduction in revenue"
  5. Medimmune, Inc. v. GenenTech, Inc.

    549 U.S. 118 (2007)   Cited 2,663 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Holding "the phrase 'case of actual controversy' in the Act refers to the types of 'Cases' and 'Controversies' that are justiciable under Article III"
  6. Harris v. Mills

    572 F.3d 66 (2d Cir. 2009)   Cited 7,049 times
    Holding that notice and opportunity to be heard before deprivation of constitutionally protected interest coupled with Article 78 post-deprivation remedy satisfied due process
  7. Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner

    387 U.S. 136 (1967)   Cited 5,372 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs subject to a regulation had standing to challenge it even though the Attorney General had yet to "authorize criminal and seizure actions for violations of the statute"
  8. Hayden v. Paterson

    594 F.3d 150 (2d Cir. 2010)   Cited 1,674 times
    Holding that the race-neutral reenactment of a state constitution's felon disenfranchisement provision erased the discriminatory taint of earlier enactments
  9. Md. Casualty Co. v. Pacific Co.

    312 U.S. 270 (1941)   Cited 2,979 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that declaratory judgment action was ripe where state action was pending, and state law gave party the right to sue the other
  10. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Haworth

    300 U.S. 227 (1937)   Cited 3,516 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a request for a declaratory judgment regarding an insured's disability was justiciable
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 362,607 times   962 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 164,455 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
  13. Section 1391 - Venue generally

    28 U.S.C. § 1391   Cited 29,289 times   200 Legal Analyses
    Finding that venue lies where a "substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim" occurred
  14. Section 2 - Judicial Power and Jurisdiction

    U.S. Const. art. III, § 2   Cited 11,196 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Granting federal courts power only to resolve “cases” and “controversies”
  15. Section 302 - Personal jurisdiction by acts of non-domiciliaries

    N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 302   Cited 4,377 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that service may be made "to a person of suitable age and discretion at the actual place of business, dwelling place or usual place of abode of the person to be served and by ... mailing the summons to the person to be served at his or her last known residence"
  16. Section 301 - Jurisdiction over persons, property or status

    N.Y. CPLR 301   Cited 1,602 times
    Codifying caselaw that incorporates "doing business" standard
  17. Section 475 - Attorney's lien in action, special or other proceeding

    N.Y. Jud. Law § 475   Cited 789 times
    Requiring that in order to assert a charging lien, the attorney must make an application to the court to determine and enforce the lien
  18. Section 1655 - Lien enforcement; absent defendants

    28 U.S.C. § 1655   Cited 364 times
    Allowing district courts to order an absent defendant to appear in a case involving lien enforcement