§Why CasetextPricing

Gilliam v. Fidelity Investments et al

MEMORANDUM in Opposition re MOTION to Consolidate Cases Fidelity Defendants' Memorandum In Opposition To The Gilliam Plaintiffs' Motion For Consolidation Of Related Cases

4 Cited authorities

  1. Daily Income Fund, Inc. v. Fox

    464 U.S. 523 (1984)   Cited 290 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that there is no demand prerequisite for § 36(b) claims

  2. Liberty Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Marketing Corp.

    149 F.R.D. 65 (D.N.J. 1993)   Cited 150 times
    Holding that simply because the proposed class members allege the same theory of recovery does not establish that legal or factual commonality exists

  3. Seguro de Servicio de Salud v. McAuto Systems

    878 F.2d 5 (1st Cir. 1989)   Cited 53 times
    Holding that consolidation of arbitration was inappropriate where the effect would be to force the parties to forgo locale provisions bargained for in their contracts

  4. Data Gen. v. Grumman Sys. Support

    834 F. Supp. 477 (D. Mass. 1992)   Cited 8 times
    In Data General, the defendant acquired copies of the plaintiff's software program, ADEX, from former employees of the plaintiff in violation of the confidentiality agreements between the former employees and the plaintiff.