24 Cited authorities

  1. District of Columbia et al. v. Heller

    554 U.S. 570 (2008)   Cited 3,442 times   50 Legal Analyses
    Holding it irrelevant to the constitutionality of D.C.'s "handgun" ban that the law allowed citizens the possession of substitutes, like "long guns"
  2. McDonald v. City of Chicago

    561 U.S. 742 (2010)   Cited 2,262 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Second Amendment applies to the states, through incorporation under the Fourteenth Amendment
  3. United States v. Salerno

    481 U.S. 739 (1987)   Cited 5,391 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "extensive safeguards" are necessary "to repel a facial challenge"
  4. Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A.

    544 U.S. 528 (2005)   Cited 1,157 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a substantive due process inquiry has "no proper place" in Takings doctrine, while distinguishing Nollan and Dolan as a special application of unconstitutional conditions doctrine for Takings
  5. Perry Ed. Assn. v. Perry Local Educators' Assn

    460 U.S. 37 (1983)   Cited 2,242 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that content-neutral time, place, and manner restrictions on speech must be "narrowly tailored to serve a significant government interest, and leave open ample alternative channels of communication"
  6. Cornelius v. Naacp Legal Defense Ed. Fund

    473 U.S. 788 (1985)   Cited 1,543 times
    Holding that a charitable fundraising drive conducted in a federal workplace was a nonpublic forum
  7. United States v. Grace

    461 U.S. 171 (1983)   Cited 809 times
    Holding that because "[t]here is no separation, no fence, and no indication whatever to persons stepping from the street to the curb and sidewalks that serve as the perimeter of the Court grounds that they have entered some special type of enclave," the public sidewalks surrounding the Supreme Court were public fora and noting that "[t]here is nothing to indicate to the public that these sidewalks are part of the Supreme Court grounds or are in any way different from other public sidewalks in the city"
  8. United States v. Kokinda

    497 U.S. 720 (1990)   Cited 489 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a sidewalk next to a post office was a nonpublic forum because it "was constructed solely to assist postal patrons to negotiate the space between the parking lot and the front door of the post office, not to facilitate the daily commerce and life of the neighborhood or city"
  9. Ezell v. City of Chicago

    651 F.3d 684 (7th Cir. 2011)   Cited 527 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a supplier of firing-range facilities had standing to challenge a Chicago ordinance that burdened its potential customers' firearms training
  10. U.S. v. Marzzarella

    614 F.3d 85 (3d Cir. 2010)   Cited 383 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a federal law banning possession of a firearm with an altered serial number “would pass muster under either intermediate scrutiny or strict scrutiny”
  11. Section 922 - Unlawful acts

    18 U.S.C. § 922   Cited 60,269 times   181 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "even before the sale of a firearm, the gun, its component parts, ammunition, and the raw materials from which they are made have considerably moved in interstate commerce"
  12. Section 16-11-127 - Carrying weapons or long guns in unauthorized locations

    Ga. Code § 16-11-127   Cited 25 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Noting that “private property owners or persons in legal control of property through a lease, rental agreement, licensing agreement, contract, or any other agreement to control access to such property” may forbid the possession of a weapon
  13. Section 232.1 - Conduct on postal property

    39 C.F.R. § 232.1   Cited 63 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting the sale or use of any controlled substance on postal premises
  14. Section 327.13 - Explosives, firearms, other weapons and fireworks

    36 C.F.R. § 327.13   Cited 12 times

    (a) The possession of loaded firearms, ammunition, loaded projectile firing devices, bows and arrows, crossbows, or other weapons is prohibited unless: (1) In the possession of a Federal, state or local law enforcement officer; (2) Being used for hunting or fishing as permitted under § 327.8 , with devices being unloaded when transported to, from or between hunting and fishing sites; (3) Being used at authorized shooting ranges; or (4) Written permission has been received from the District Commander