§Why CasetextPricing

Genworth Financial Wealth Mgmt Inc v. McMullan et al

Memorandum in Opposition re MOTION for Clarification 101 Order on Motion for TRO

9 Cited authorities

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Edwards

    514 U.S. 300 (1995)   Cited 1,476 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a bankruptcy court could not use “jurisdictional bootstrap” to “exercise jurisdiction that would not otherwise exist”

  2. Bellevue Manor Associates v. U.S.

    165 F.3d 1249 (9th Cir. 1999)   Cited 64 times
    Holding that Rufo applies to all judgments

  3. Sierra Club v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

    732 F.2d 253 (2d Cir. 1984)   Cited 88 times
    Finding no abuse of discretion when district court took judicial notice of a letter by a "middle-level [Federal Highway Administration] administrator"

  4. PALM BAY INTERNATIONAL v. MARCHESI DI BAROLO S.P.A

    CV 09-601 (ADS) (AKT) (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 9, 2009)   Cited 12 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Denying a motion to compel, in part, where "other than innuendo, Defendant has not provided any substantive evidence of Plaintiff's deliberately withholding such documents"

  5. THORNTON v. UL ENTERPRISES

    Civ. 09-287E (W.D. Pa. Apr. 15, 2011)

    Civ. 09-287E. April 15, 2011 OPINION MAURICE COHILL JR., District Judge Pending before the Court is Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Lance Thornton's "Motion to Compel Discovery Responses" [ECF #99]. In this motion, Thornton explains that during the deposition of Defendant/Counter-Claimant Steve Larson ("Mr. Larson"), Mr. Larson's counsel instructed Mr. Larson not to answer certain questions which Plaintiff opines Mr. Larson should have answered. Mr. Larson was the President of Defendant/Counter-Claimant

  6. Webb v. CBS Broadcasting, Inc.

    Case No. 08 C 6241 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 13, 2011)

    Case No. 08 C 6241. January 13, 2011 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GERALDINE BROWN, Magistrate Judge This opinion addresses two motions: defendant CBS Broadcasting Inc.'s ("CBS") motion for protective order [dkt 92], and plaintiffs Jill and Robert Webb's ("the Webbs") motion to compel, to enjoin and for sanctions [dkt 109 (under seal)]. The events giving rise to the motions are interrelated although they raise separate legal issues. CBS contends that due to repeatedly irrelevant and improper questioning

  7. Playtex Products v. Procter Gamble

    02 Civ. 8046 (WHP) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 11, 2008)   Cited 1 times

    02 Civ. 8046 (WHP). February 11, 2008 Counsel of Record: Matthew B. Lehr, Esq., Davis Polk Wardwell, New York, NY, Counsel for Plaintiff. Harold P. Weinberger, Esq., Kramer Levin Naftalis Frankel LLP, New York, NY, Counsel for Defendant. REDACTED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WILLIAM PAULEY III, District Judge Defendant Procter Gamble Company ("P G") moves pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(5) to vacate or, in the alternative, to clarify this Court's Judgment and Order of Permanent Injunction dated May 29, 2003

  8. De Wagenknecht v. Stinnes

    243 F.2d 413 (D.C. Cir. 1957)   Cited 8 times

    Nos. 13457, 13458. Argued March 5, 1957. Decided April 18, 1957. Mr. Ralph G. Albrecht, New York City, with whom Messrs. Henry F. Butler and John Geyer Tausig, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellants in No. 13,457 and appellees in No. 13,458. Mr. James H. Mann, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Dean B. Lewis, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for Mrs. Hugo Stinnes, Sr., appellee in No. 13,457 and appellant in No. 13,458. Mr. Lawrence Lesser, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance

  9. Rule 30 - Depositions by Oral Examination

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 30   Cited 16,033 times   126 Legal Analyses
    Upholding a district court's decision not to consider the plaintiff's deposition errata sheets in opposition to a motion for summary judgment when they were untimely